Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Error recurrence for a chain of block-encoded products

Statement

Let n≥1 and k≥1, let Ai∈Cn×n, and let αi>0 satisfy ∥Ai∥op≤αi. Suppose the separately padded block encodings have compressed blocks Bi=Ai/αi+Ei with ∥Ei∥op≤εi and εi≥0. Composing them on separate ancillas in the declared order gives normalization ∏i=1kαi and an all-zero block B1⋯Bk satisfying

∥B1⋯Bk−A1⋯Ak∏i=1kαi∥op≤∑i=1kεi∏j≠i(1+εj).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The matrices, positive normalizations, separate-ancilla product convention, and error bounds in the statement.

[F1]

Product block-encoding error bound: two separately padded encodings compose in their declared order, with multiplied normalization and the product of their compressed blocks.

[F2]

The operator norm is zero on the zero domain and otherwise is max_{||v||=1} ||Tv||: the operator norm is the maximum action on a unit vector.

[F3]

The operator norm is submultiplicative and satisfies ||T^*T|| = ||T||^2: ∥ST∥op≤∥S∥op∥T∥op for compatible maps.

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

Inductively apply [F1] to the first k−1 encodings and the kth encoding, using disjoint ancillas at every composition. The resulting compression is B1⋯Bk in the stated order, and each step multiplies the normalization, giving ∏iαi.

1.2F2givenalgebra

Put Ci:=Ai/αi, so Bi=Ci+Ei. The hypotheses give ∥Ci∥op≤1. For every unit vector x, the vector triangle inequality gives ∥Bix∥≤∥Cix∥+∥Eix∥≤1+εi; taking the maximum in [F2] yields ∥Bi∥op≤1+εi.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F2F3algebra∎

The telescoping identity B1⋯Bk−C1⋯Ck=∑i=1k(B1⋯Bi−1)Ei(Ci+1⋯Ck) follows by adding and subtracting the intermediate products B1⋯BiCi+1⋯Ck. By [F3], [F2], and [step 1.2], its norm is at most ∑iεi∏j<i(1+εj), since every later ∥Cj∥≤1. Each omitted factor (1+εj) is at least one, so this is at most the displayed sum over all j≠i. Finally C1⋯Ck=A1⋯Ak/(∏iαi), proving the result, including k=1.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources