How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Error recurrence for a chain of block-encoded products
Statement
Let and , let , and let satisfy . Suppose the separately padded block encodings have compressed blocks with and . Composing them on separate ancillas in the declared order gives normalization and an all-zero block satisfying
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The matrices, positive normalizations, separate-ancilla product convention, and error bounds in the statement.
Product block-encoding error bound: two separately padded encodings compose in their declared order, with multiplied normalization and the product of their compressed blocks.
The operator norm is zero on the zero domain and otherwise is max_{||v||=1} ||Tv||: the operator norm is the maximum action on a unit vector.
The operator norm is submultiplicative and satisfies ||T^*T|| = ||T||^2: for compatible maps.
Proof
Inductively apply [F1] to the first encodings and the th encoding, using disjoint ancillas at every composition. The resulting compression is in the stated order, and each step multiplies the normalization, giving .
Put , so . The hypotheses give . For every unit vector , the vector triangle inequality gives ; taking the maximum in [F2] yields .
The telescoping identity follows by adding and subtracting the intermediate products . By [F3], [F2], and [step 1.2], its norm is at most , since every later . Each omitted factor is at least one, so this is at most the displayed sum over all . Finally , proving the result, including .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew M. Childs, Lecture Notes on Quantum Algorithms, Chapter 29 (17 April 2025) (standard reference, not scraped)
- András Gilyén, Yuan Su, Guang Hao Low, and Nathan Wiebe, Quantum singular value transformation and beyond, Lemma 53 (standard reference, not scraped)