How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A bounded polynomial approximation to a scaled exponential
Example
For , take and target on . A one-ancilla exact dilation has top-left block . Decompose into the even component and odd component ; the other two components are identically zero and are omitted using their exact zero certificates, so . The bounded parity polynomials (even, degree ) and (odd, degree ) use exact QSP phase lists and , respectively, and give an LCU block , a -block encoding of the linear approximation to . In exact phase and LCU models its normalized top-block error is at most .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , exact ideal phase operations and LCU, and the functions and polynomials above.
Finite block encoding: a unitary whose designated compression is with normalization one is an exact block encoding of .
QSVT implementation of a bounded matrix function, Matrix-function transformation error and resource bound, QSVT action on singular subspaces, QSP signal matrix and ordered phase sequence, LCU projected-block correctness, and Uniform polynomial approximation transfers to a Hermitian matrix: parity polynomial phase lists give their stated singular transforms, the exact LCU compression is the normalized weighted sum, and scalar error on the spectrum transfers to operator norm.
The exponential definitions of complex sine, cosine, hyperbolic sine, and hyperbolic cosine equal their entire power series and , , and : , with the usual convergent Taylor series for sine and cosine.
The alternating series test: if is nonincreasing with then converges, the sum lies between any two consecutive partial sums, and the error after terms is at most : for an alternating series whose nonnegative term magnitudes decrease to zero, the remainder is bounded by the first omitted term.
Verification
Let and set . Since , , and , and . Thus is unitary and its top-left block is , proving the exact dilation assertion by [F1].
The real part of is even and the imaginary part is , which is odd, by [F3]. For phase list the degree-zero signal sequence has upper-left entry . For , the upper-left entry of is , by the sequence definition [F2]. Using the exact dilation from step 1.1, the polynomials have matching parity and satisfy , on . The coefficient weights are both one, so the LCU scale is ; by [F2] its normalized weighted sum is , with the stated normalization.
The sine and cosine series converge by [F3], so their terms tend to zero. For , their term magnitudes are nonincreasing, so [F4] gives ; the sine series similarly gives . On the two eigenvalues these imply component errors and . With , exact phases and exact LCU, the error formula in [F2] gives normalized block error at most . Equivalently, , which is at and at . The scalar error is at most on ; applying the polynomial matrix-function transfer theorem [F2] to and gives the same operator-norm bound.
Depends on
- QSVT implementation of a bounded matrix function
- Uniform polynomial approximation transfers to a Hermitian matrix
- Matrix-function transformation error and resource bound
- Finite block encoding
- LCU block-encoding construction
- LCU projected-block correctness
- QSVT action on singular subspaces
- QSP signal matrix and ordered phase sequence
- The spectral functional calculus f(T) for a normal endomorphism
- The exponential definitions of complex sine, cosine, hyperbolic sine, and hyperbolic cosine equal their entire power series
- The alternating series test: if $(b_k)$ is nonincreasing with $b_k \to 0$ then $\sum_{k} (-1)^{k} b_k$ converges, the sum lies between any two consecutive partial sums, and the error after $n$ terms is at most $b_n$
- $\exp(x+iy)=e^x(\cos y+i\sin y)$, $|\exp(x+iy)|=e^x$, and $e^{i\pi}+1=0$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
71 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- András Gilyén, Yuan Su, Guang Hao Low, and Nathan Wiebe, Quantum singular value transformation and beyond, §§2–3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew M. Childs, Lecture Notes on Quantum Algorithms, Chapter 29 §29.3 (standard reference, not scraped)