How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
QC24 State Preparation Cost Model
Definition
Fix an integer and . An explicit amplitude-table input is a list of exact complex numbers in the ordered basis convention of Big-endian encoding of ordered bit strings; it is valid when . Its target is the pure-state ray under Pure state and ray: nonzero scalar multiples represent the same ray, and is a unit representative when the table is normalized. A claim must state whether its output error is projective chord distance QC24 Projective Chord Distance or a representative-level vector error.
The cost record keeps these quantities separate: (1) the classical encoding length and table-reading/preprocessing work; (2) continuous-angle gate occurrences, or finite-alphabet gate occurrences when that model is specified; (3) width, clean-workspace and serial-depth usage; and (4) the declared output-error metric. If an encoding assigns exactly bits to each real coordinate and bits to each imaginary coordinate, with basis order implicit, the dense table contains exactly input bits. Those bits must decode to the input table in an exact-table claim; finite-precision approximations are separate inputs with separate error hypotheses. An explicit table is classical input: this definition grants no coherent table oracle, QRAM, or free loading operation. Ideal exact complex arithmetic and finite-precision bit cost are distinct models.
Depends on
Used by
- LCU block-encoding construction Algorithm
- QC24 State Preparation Algorithm
- Sparse Hermitian block encoding Algorithm
- Classical output, quantum-state output, and access costs Definition
- LCU decomposition and access model Definition
- Clean sparse-state preparation from sorted XOR locations Lemma
- Amplitude Table Precision and Compilation Theorem
- Correctness and access cost of sparse block encoding Theorem
- QC24 Continuous-Parameter State Preparation Lower Bound Theorem
- QC24 Discrete Alphabet Approximate Preparation Lower Bound Theorem
- QC24 Explicit State-Preparation Cost Guarantee Theorem
- QC24 Finite Alphabet Exact Nonuniversality Theorem
- QC24 Finite Width Topology Count Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John Preskill, Quantum Computation, Chapter 5, Classical and Quantum Circuits (standard reference, not scraped)
- Vivek V. Shende, Stephen S. Bullock, and Igor L. Markov, Synthesis of Quantum Logic Circuits (standard reference, not scraped)