How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Height geometry and weak-membership binary search
Statement
Let be a closed convex body in , . In any rotated coordinates set and . Then is convex, finite on , and -Lipschitz on . Every interior point of has a subgradient, and every such subgradient at a point in the interior of this ball has norm at most .
For , a query at , , has these implications: an IN answer implies ; an OUT answer implies . Hence binary search on , returning its final upper endpoint when its width is at most , approximates within if . It uses membership queries and has a clean coherent implementation using the same order of queries and inverse queries.
Finally, let . If receives OUT and on , then satisfies for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The body, radii, height, deterministic weak-membership completion, and positive precision parameters in the Statement.
Quantum convex membership and weak-separation model specifies the two valid weak-membership assertions and the radius sandwich.
A nonempty closed Euclidean convex set has a unique nearest point to each point. (Every point has a unique nearest point in a nonempty closed Euclidean convex set)
A bounded Euclidean sequence has a convergent subsequence. (For every bounded sequence in has a convergent subsequence)
A subgradient at means throughout the domain. (Subgradients and the subdifferential of a convex function)
Closed bounded Euclidean sets are compact, and the Euclidean norm satisfies Cauchy–Schwarz. (Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, Cauchy-Schwarz with its equality case, the triangle inequality for , the parallelogram law and polarisation)
Proof
Compactness of makes each nonempty vertical section compact, so its minimum exists; projection makes compact and convex. Convex combinations of two minimizing boundary points show convexity of . For , the inner ball supplies a point at height zero, while the outer ball bounds all heights below by . Thus on that ball.
More generally on , , let be distinct and extend the directed line from through by to . Then and convexity on the segment gives . Exchange and put to obtain the Lipschitz claim.
The ball lies in . Its convex hull with contains a ball of radius about for every : combine the vertex with every point of that ball. Consequently all heights between and lie in the inward -erosion, whenever this interval is nonempty. If the claimed OUT bound is automatic from and . For , write . If the interval is empty, then , so ; every therefore satisfies . If the interval is nonempty, OUT excludes its heights, so . This uses an inclusion of balls, not an incorrect identity for the erosion of a cone.
For completeness, subgradients here need no arbitrary selection. The truncated epigraph is compact and convex: it is the image of the compact set of pairs consisting of a point of and a permitted upward vertical displacement. Fix interior and . Let , and let be its unique nearest point in by [F2]. Minimality along a segment gives for all , by expanding squared distance and taking the right derivative at zero. Moreover . A subsequence of the unit normals converges by [F3] to a unit normal with on . Upward vertical segments imply ; if , interior displacements of in both horizontal directions force , a contradiction. Thus and is a subgradient of on . At a point where the Lipschitz bound holds on a neighborhood, applying the subgradient inequality in the directions gives .
Fix . A subgradient of norm at most gives the supporting inequality on . If is within of , Cauchy–Schwarz gives . This proves the IN implication, also at the transverse-ball boundary by the bound from step 2.1 on slightly larger balls and passage to its limit.
Maintain endpoints . Initially and . An IN answer replaces by the midpoint and preserves its lower bound by step 4.1; OUT replaces and preserves its upper bound by step 2.2. When , these invariants give . Each iteration halves the bracket, proving the logarithmic query count. Fixed finite arithmetic and the deterministic oracle completion make the whole binary-search transcript a function of the input label. Store its transcript, copy its output, and reverse its computation and oracle calls; this implements that value oracle with clean work and only a constant factor more queries.
Write . Evaluating the approximate-subgradient premise at gives . Since and , that inequality gives . At the OUT implication gives ; if its height is below , this inequality follows directly from . If , an OUT answer requires by the inner ball, and the same inequality again follows from . Divide by to obtain the stated separation inequality.
Depends on
- Quantum convex membership and weak-separation model
- Subgradients and the subdifferential of a convex function
- Every point has a unique nearest point in a nonempty closed Euclidean convex set
- For $n \ge 1$ every bounded sequence in $\mathbb{R}^n$ has a convergent subsequence
- Heine-Borel in $\mathbb{R}^n$: with the Euclidean metric a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
- Cauchy-Schwarz $\lvert\langle x,y\rangle\rvert \le \lVert x\rVert_2\lVert y\rVert_2$ with its equality case, the triangle inequality for $\lVert\cdot\rVert_2$, the parallelogram law and polarisation
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
59 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- van Apeldoorn, Gilyen, Gribling, de Wolf, Convex optimization using quantum oracles, Lemmas 14–21 and Theorem 23 (standard reference, not scraped)