Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite gapped spectral projection regularity

Statement

For a C2 finite-dimensional Hermitian path with a coherently followed spectral cluster separated from the complementary spectrum by a positive gap, the spectral projection P(s) is C2 on [0,1].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite adiabatic path and the fixed-rank, locally Riesz spectral band from Finite adiabatic path model.

[F2]

For a normal matrix H=∑jλjPj, functions of H are the finite sums f(H)=∑jf(λj)Pj (The spectral functional calculus f(T) for a normal endomorphism).

Proof

1.1givenF1F3algebrachoose

Fix s0∈[0,1]. By [F1], the selected finite set of eigenvalues at s0 is separated from its complement by the positive gap. Choose finitely many positively oriented closed contours whose interiors contain exactly this cluster and whose boundaries avoid the spectrum; for a sufficiently small neighborhood of s0, the resolvent on these contours remains defined. Indeed, if R0(z)=(H(s0)−zI)−1 and ∥H(s)−H(s0)∥∥R0(z)∥<1 uniformly on the compact contour, then submultiplicativity [F3] makes the Neumann series for I+(H(s)−H(s0))R0(z) convergent and gives the inverse.

2.1givenF1F2step 1.1algebra

On this neighborhood, [F2] and the scalar residue formula give the same Riesz projection as the definition: P(s)=−12πi∮Γ(H(s)−zI)−1 dz. To see this, diagonalize H(s); the integral of (λ−z)−1 is −2πi when λ is inside the contour and zero when it is outside, so the sum is exactly the projection onto the selected eigenspaces.

3.1step 2.1algebra

Put Rz(s)=(H(s)−zI)−1. Differentiating (H−zI)Rz=I gives R˙z=−RzH′Rz and differentiating again gives R¨z=2RzH′RzH′Rz−RzH′′Rz. The contour is compact and stays uniformly in the resolvent set on this neighborhood, so these integrands and their first two derivatives are continuous uniformly in z. Differentiation under the finite contour integral is therefore valid, and step 2.1 makes P twice continuously differentiable near s0.

4.1givenF1F2step 3.1∎

On the overlap of two such neighborhoods, each contour formula projects onto the same coherently followed eigenspaces by [F1]–[F2]; hence the local projections agree. Their first two derivatives consequently agree on overlaps, so the local C2 representations patch to a global C2 map on [0,1], with one-sided derivatives at the endpoints.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources