Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite JRS adiabatic projector bound

Statement

Let H:[0,1]→L(V) be a C2 finite-dimensional Hermitian path, and let P(s) be a coherently followed spectral projection of constant rank m≥1, separated from its complement by full gap g(s)>0. Let UT solve iUT′(s)=TH(s)UT(s) with UT(0)=I, where T>0. Define Am(s)=1T[m∥H′(0)∥g(0)2+m∥H′(s)∥g(s)2+∫0s(m∥H′′(r)∥g(r)2+7mm∥H′(r)∥2g(r)3)dr]. Then ∥UT(s)P(0)UT(s)∗−P(s)∥≤Am(s). For every unit ψ∈ran⁡P(0), its transition probability out of the band at time s is at most Am(s)2. The rank m may be larger than the number of distinct eigenvalues in the band; using rank in the constants is a valid upper bound.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite path, its gapped band, the slow-time propagator, and T>0 from Finite adiabatic path model.

[F1]

The band projection is C2 (Finite gapped spectral projection regularity).

[F2]

The twiddle transform satisfies P˙=H′~, ∥X~∥≤m∥X∥/g, the block bounds ∥QX~P∥≤m∥QXP∥/g and ∥PX~Q∥≤m∥PXQ∥/g, ∥QP¨P∥≤m∥H′′∥/g+4m∥H′∥2/g2, and ∥QP˙~˙P∥≤m∥QP¨P∥/g+2m∥H′∥∥P˙∥/g2 (Finite spectral-band derivative estimates for adiabatic paths).

[F4]

A continuous finite matrix coefficient has a unique propagator on [0,1] (Linear matrix ODEs have unique global solutions on a fixed interval), after realifying its complex coordinates.

Proof

1.1F1F4givenalgebra

Put D(s)=[P′(s),P(s)]. Since P,P′ are self-adjoint, D∗=−D, so KA(s)=TH(s)+iD(s) is self-adjoint. Let UA solve iUA′=KAUA, UA(0)=I; [F4] gives existence and uniqueness, and differentiating UA∗UA gives unitarity. Differentiating P2=P yields PP′P=0 and P′P+PP′=P′, hence [D,P]=P′. Therefore P solves iP′=[KA,P], and so does F(s)=UA(s)P(0)UA(s)∗. Both have initial value P(0); uniqueness for this finite linear matrix ODE gives F(s)=P(s), or equivalently UA(s)P(0)UA(s)∗=P(s).

2.1step 1.1F3algebra

Define the unitary wave operator Ω(s)=UA(s)∗UT(s). Differentiating with the two evolution equations gives Ω′(s)=−UA(s)∗D(s)UT(s) and therefore Ω(s)=I−∫0sUA(r)∗D(r)UA(r)Ω(r) dr. The intertwining identity in step 1.1 implies that the conjugated kernel is off-diagonal relative to P(0),Q(0) and that Q(0)Ω(s)P(0)=−∫0sQ(0)P′(r)[r]P(0)Ω(r)P(0) dr, where X[r]=UA(r)∗X(r)UA(r).

3.1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra

For any differentiable X, the commutator identity from Finite spectral-band derivative estimates for adiabatic paths and step 1.1 gives ddr(Q(0)X~[r]P(0))=−iTQ(0)X[r]P(0)+Q(0)X~˙[r]P(0). Indeed, Q[H,X~]P=−QXP, and the extra commutator with iD/T has zero QP block because P[D,X~]Q=Q[D,X~]P=0 when D and X~ are off-diagonal. Integrating this identity by parts in step 2.1 with X=P′ and Y(r)=P(0)Ω(r)P(0) yields Q(0)Ω(s)P(0)=−iT[Q(0)P′~[r]P(0)Y(r)∣0s−∫0sQ(0)P′~˙[r]P(0)Y(r) dr−∫0sQ(0)P′~[r]P(0)P(0)Ω′(r)P(0) dr]. Here ∥Y(r)∥≤1 and P(0)Ω′(r)P(0)=P(0)P′[r]Q(0)Ω(r)P(0), because the PQ block of [P′,P] is −PP′Q. The last integrand is therefore bounded by ∥QP′~P∥∥P′∥∥Q(0)ΩP(0)∥. Repeating the same calculation with P(0) and Q(0) interchanged bounds ∥P(0)ΩQ(0)∥ by the same expression.

4.1F2F3step 3.1algebra

Use [F2] on the endpoint and derivative terms of step 3.1, and ∥QP′~P∥≤m∥P′∥/g on its product term. Since ∥Q(0)ΩP(0)∥≤1, this gives ∥Q(0)ΩP(0)∥≤1T[m∥P′(0)∥g(0)+m∥P′(s)∥g(s)+∫0s(m∥QP′′P∥g+m∥P′∥2g+2m∥H′∥∥P′∥g2)dr]. Now ∥P′∥≤m∥H′∥/g. The first two integral terms are respectively at most m∥H′′∥/g2+4mm∥H′∥2/g3 and mm∥H′∥2/g3; the last is at most 2mm∥H′∥2/g3. Their sum gives exactly the integrand in Am(s), and the endpoint terms give its two endpoint summands. The same bound holds for ∥P(0)ΩQ(0)∥.

5.1step 1.1step 4.1algebra∎

Unitary conjugation by UA and step 1.1 give ∥UTP(0)UT∗−P(s)∥=∥ΩP(0)Ω∗−P(0)∥=∥Q(0)ΩP(0)−P(0)ΩQ(0)∥. The last operator is off-diagonal with the two blocks bounded in step 4.1; its norm is the maximum of their norms, so it is at most Am(s). For a unit ψ∈ran⁡P(0), Q(s)UT(s)ψ=UA(s)Q(0)Ω(s)P(0)ψ by step 1.1. Its squared norm is the transition probability and is at most ∥Q(0)Ω(s)P(0)∥2≤Am(s)2.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources