Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite adiabatic braid compilation input

Definition

A finite adiabatic braid input consists of a finite-dimensional complex Hilbert space V, a C2 Hermitian path H(s) on 0≤s≤1, a norm-continuous rank-m orthogonal spectral projection P(s), with m≥1, onto a coherently followed band with uniform positive full gap, a slow-time schedule T>0, and an explicit initial isometry A0:Cm→ran⁡P(0). These are the path and propagator hypotheses of Finite adiabatic path model; the output propagator UT solves iUT′(s)=TH(s)UT(s). Also supply an endpoint isometry A1:Cm→ran⁡P(1) and a specified Fibonacci braid word b with categorical action ρ(b) on a specified m-dimensional fusion space Vcat, in the fixed convention of Fibonacci fusion data and chiral convention, and a unitary target ρlog(b)∈U(Cm) in the declared logical input/output frames. Supply unitary coordinate maps Qj:Cm→Vcat for j=0,1 and set ρlog(b)=Q1∗ρ(b)Q0. The band identifications are then ιj=AjQj∗, as in Physical braid implementation interface. The target is the selected categorical F/R action written in those frames, including the phase convention recorded by Braid phase reference and correction ledger; specifying it does not assert that the physical path realizes it. The in-band transport condition is the separate hypothesis ∥P(1)UT(1)A0−A1ρlog(b)∥op≤ϵtr. This condition is not a consequence of a projector-leakage estimate. The model also specifies a finite output measurement and, if needed, its own implementation-variation bound. The JRS expression and leakage consequence are handled as a separate result.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources