How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Physical realization boundary for braid compilation
Definition
A physical realization record for a mathematical braid-compilation instance contains, in addition to its finite fusion input and braid word, all of: a specified physical state space and low-energy-sector identification; a Hermitian path and constant-rank uniformly gapped projection; an initial preparation isometry and its cost; a slow-time schedule; an endpoint frame; a separately justified identification of band transport with the logical-frame Fibonacci target of Finite adiabatic braid compilation input, including its phase; and a locality model for exchanges. A local-Hamiltonian model specifies a finite lattice with its metric, an interaction range , and a uniform per-site interaction bound for a decomposition : every is Hermitian and supported on , , and The record separately states the local-indistinguishability and stability criteria, including their region scales, norms, tolerances, and the evidence used to establish them. It also supplies explicit preparation, excitation, measurement, and control-error terms. The first spectral-path clauses are the finite interface in Physical braid implementation interface and Finite adiabatic braid compilation input. The error ledger is Finite braid compilation and adiabatic error budget. A successful SK compilation, projective density theorem, or JRS leakage estimate supplies none of the material, locality, preparation, or band-holonomy evidence by itself; those are independent record fields, not consequences of the mathematical compiler. Only terms appearing as hypotheses in the stated error ledger contribute to its measured-output bound; a separately recorded preparation, excitation, or control error requires an additional bound before it can be included in a total physical error claim.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John Preskill, Lecture Notes for Physics 219: Quantum Computation, Chapter 9: Topological Quantum Computation (standard reference, not scraped)
- Chetan Nayak, Steven H. Simon, Ady Stern, Michael Freedman, and Sankar Das Sarma, Non-Abelian Anyons and Topological Quantum Computation (standard reference, not scraped)
- Sabine Jansen, Mary-Beth Ruskai, and Ruedi Seiler, Bounds for the adiabatic approximation with applications to quantum computation (standard reference, not scraped)