Alphabeta Math
AlgorithmAlgorithm: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

SU(2) Fibonacci Solovay–Kitaev compiler

Definition

Inputs: a positive binary-rational tolerance 0<ε≤η0; the fixed inverse-closed Fibonacci alphabet GFib; and a fixed certified base-net certificate (N0,η0,L0) with 0<η0<64−2. Select exactly one target interface:

  1. Ideal exact-real interface: supply an exact-real handle for S∈SU(2) with exact fixed-dimensional matrix operations and exact comparisons. Invoke the ideal recursive procedure Solovay–Kitaev Unitary Compiler for SU(2) on S and ε.
  2. Finite Turing interface: supply a polynomial-time Cauchy name for S∈SU(2) and the minimal-polynomial and rational isolating-interval descriptions of every real and imaginary gate coordinate required by the finite-precision theorem. Run the deterministic Turing implementation established by Finite-Precision Bit Complexity of the SU(2) Solovay–Kitaev Compiler on that name, alphabet, certificate, and tolerance. This branch uses its certified interval decisions and does not invoke exact-real comparisons.

In either branch, return the resulting word in the labels zB1,zB2,(zB1)−1,(zB2)−1, its expanded length, and its Artin exponent sum k. The base-net list is supplied certificate data; this algorithm does not compute it from density. A Cauchy name alone is not an exact-real handle, and the ideal branch makes no finite bit-time claim.

Output: a braid word b and ledger scalar (R1z−1)k such that, when the algorithm's hypotheses hold, the normalized SU(2) matrix of b is within the requested tolerance of S. Its physical matrix carries the recorded scalar from Braid phase reference and correction ledger.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources