How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hadamard character sum on F_2^n
Statement
For and , with the binary dot product of Binary dot product as parity,
Consequently, for every ,
where is the exact one-qubit gate of Exact one-qubit gates and rotations and tensor factors follow the ordered register convention of Ordered tensor registers, their inner product, and wire permutations.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer and binary strings .
Binary dot product as parity: is the parity , a bit.
Exact one-qubit gates and rotations: in the ordered basis , .
Finite registers and their ordered computational bases and Big-endian encoding of ordered bit strings: the -qubit basis is the ordered product basis indexed by bit strings in lexicographic order, with the first wire most significant.
Ordered tensor registers, their inner product, and wire permutations: the tensor register keeps its displayed factor order and has the product inner product on elementary tensors.
Tensor products of finitely many linear maps: sends an elementary tensor to .
Dirac Notation Conversion: denotes the vector in the finite-dimensional register.
Proof
By [F1], , since the exponent parity is the sum of the coordinate products modulo two. Distributivity over the finite Cartesian product gives Each factor is when and when . Thus the product is when all coordinates of vanish and is otherwise.
By [F2], on each factor . Applying [F5] to the ordered product basis [F3] gives a coefficient at , by [F1]. Summing these coefficients proves the tensor-Hadamard formula in the Statement.
Depends on
Used by
- One Simon Fourier-sampling sample Algorithm
- One-query Bernstein–Vazirani algorithm Algorithm
- One-query Deutsch algorithm Algorithm
- One-query Deutsch–Jozsa algorithm Algorithm
- Deutsch, Deutsch–Jozsa and Bernstein–Vazirani examples Example
- Bernstein–Vazirani algorithm returns the secret exactly Theorem
- Deutsch–Jozsa algorithm is exact Theorem
- Simon query and output measurement produce a coset pair Theorem
- Simon samples uniformly from s-perp Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes, arXiv:1907.09415v6 (2026-08-27) (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Preskill, Quantum Information, Chapter 6: Quantum Algorithms (updated November 2020) (standard reference, not scraped)