How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Elementary lower bound for the totient ratio
Statement
For every integer , , with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer and its distinct prime divisors.
If the distinct prime divisors of are , then ; the empty product is when (Euler's product formula for , stated through a finite injective list of its prime divisors).
A prime is an integer greater than with no positive divisors other than and itself, and every integer is a finite product of primes (Prime and composite integers: is prime when and its only positive divisors are and , The fundamental theorem of arithmetic: every integer is a product of primes, and the factorisation is unique up to order — if with every and prime, then and for some ).
Integer multiplication is associative and commutative, and means for some integer (The integers form a commutative ring, Divisibility in : when for some integer ).
Proof
If , then and [F1] gives , which is the claimed bound. Suppose .
For every , the increasing distinct primes satisfy : there are only integers strictly between and , so fewer than distinct primes can lie there. Therefore each factor in [F1] obeys . Multiplying positive factors gives .
Take a prime factor list for from [F2] and sort its distinct entries as , choosing for each value its first occurrence in that finite list. By associativity and commutativity in [F3], regrouping the list gives for a positive integer . Thus the distinct-prime product divides , and since every , . Therefore , so . This proves the assertion.
Depends on
- Euler's product formula $\varphi(n)=n\prod_{p\mid n}(1-1/p)=\prod_{p^k\parallel n}(p^k-p^{k-1})$ for $n\ge1$, stated through a finite injective list of its prime divisors
- The fundamental theorem of arithmetic: every integer $n \ge 1$ is a product of primes, and the factorisation is unique up to order — if $\prod_{i<r} p_i = \prod_{j<s} q_j$ with every $p_i$ and $q_j$ prime, then $r = s$ and $q_i = p_{\pi(i)}$ for some $\pi \in \operatorname{Sym}(r)$
- Prime and composite integers: $p$ is prime when $p > 1$ and its only positive divisors are $1$ and $p$
- The integers form a commutative ring
- Divisibility in $\mathbb{Z}$: $d \mid a$ when $a = dq$ for some integer $q$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter W. Shor, Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes, arXiv:1907.09415v6 (standard reference, not scraped)