Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Global Phase Under Control

Statement

Let H be a nonzero finite-dimensional target space, let U be unitary on H, and let ∣λ∣=1. In control-first order put C(U)=(IH00U),Pλ=(100λ). Then C(λU)=(Pλ⊗IH)C(U). A scalar multiplying an entire output leaves every defined finite-POVM outcome law unchanged, whereas a scalar attached to a target matrix inside a control gives a phase on only the active control block; applying Pλ‾ on the control restores the exact controlled matrix.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The target space and unitary, a unit scalar λ, control-first ordering, and—when considering the measurement clause—any density operator ρ on the output space and any finite POVM (Ea)a∈Ω. An unconditional output scalar acts on the density by (λI)ρ(λI)∗.

[F1]

Controlled Unitary Access: controlled access is the block operator C(U)=diag⁡(IH,U) on the control-first register.

[F2]

Global Phase Equivalence: matrices are phase-equivalent when one is a scalar multiple of the other by a unit-modulus complex number; this is distinct from exact matrix equality.

[F3]

Density operator: a density operator is a nonnegative endomorphism of trace one on a nonzero finite-dimensional complex inner-product space.

[F4]

Finite POVMs and their outcome law: for a density operator ρ and a finite POVM (Ea), the outcome weight is pρ(a)=tr⁡(ρEa).

[F5]

POVM outcome weights are probabilities: when its density and finite complete-effect-family hypotheses hold, the defined POVM outcome weights form a probability distribution.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

The diagonal blocks of C(λU) are IH and λU. Multiplying the blocks of (Pλ⊗IH)C(U) gives IH and λU, so the two full matrices are equal exactly.

1.2givenF3algebra

Under the whole-output update specified in the Given, (λI)ρ(λI)∗=λλ‾ρ=ρ because ∣λ∣=1. Hence the whole-output scalar leaves the density operator unchanged.

2.1givenF2step 1.1algebra

By [F2], U and λU are phase-equivalent as target matrices. If λ≠1, Pλ is not a scalar multiple of the identity: its diagonal entries are 1 and λ. Thus step 1.1 places a phase on only the active control block. Left multiplication by Pλ‾⊗IH changes the blocks back to IH,U, so it restores C(U) exactly. For λ=1 no correction is needed.

3.1F4F5step 1.2step 1.1algebra∎

By [F4], each defined measurement weight is tr⁡(ρEa). The equality of density operators in step 1.2 makes these weights identical for every outcome a. Under the normalized-law conclusion [F5], the two probability distributions therefore agree. The global scalar in step 1.2 preserves the whole measurement law, while the controlled target scalar in step 1.1 does not become a whole-output scalar.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources