How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Global Phase Under Control
Statement
Let be a nonzero finite-dimensional target space, let be unitary on , and let . In control-first order put Then . A scalar multiplying an entire output leaves every defined finite-POVM outcome law unchanged, whereas a scalar attached to a target matrix inside a control gives a phase on only the active control block; applying on the control restores the exact controlled matrix.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The target space and unitary, a unit scalar , control-first ordering, and—when considering the measurement clause—any density operator on the output space and any finite POVM . An unconditional output scalar acts on the density by .
Controlled Unitary Access: controlled access is the block operator on the control-first register.
Global Phase Equivalence: matrices are phase-equivalent when one is a scalar multiple of the other by a unit-modulus complex number; this is distinct from exact matrix equality.
Density operator: a density operator is a nonnegative endomorphism of trace one on a nonzero finite-dimensional complex inner-product space.
Finite POVMs and their outcome law: for a density operator and a finite POVM , the outcome weight is .
POVM outcome weights are probabilities: when its density and finite complete-effect-family hypotheses hold, the defined POVM outcome weights form a probability distribution.
Proof
The diagonal blocks of are and . Multiplying the blocks of gives and , so the two full matrices are equal exactly.
Under the whole-output update specified in the Given, because . Hence the whole-output scalar leaves the density operator unchanged.
By [F2], and are phase-equivalent as target matrices. If , is not a scalar multiple of the identity: its diagonal entries are and . Thus step 1.1 places a phase on only the active control block. Left multiplication by changes the blocks back to , so it restores exactly. For no correction is needed.
By [F4], each defined measurement weight is . The equality of density operators in step 1.2 makes these weights identical for every outcome . Under the normalized-law conclusion [F5], the two probability distributions therefore agree. The global scalar in step 1.2 preserves the whole measurement law, while the controlled target scalar in step 1.1 does not become a whole-output scalar.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes, arXiv:1907.09415v6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Adriano Barenco et al., Elementary gates for quantum computation, arXiv:quant-ph/9503016v1 (standard reference, not scraped)