Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Symmetric Power Irreducible

Statement

For every positive integer d and integer k≥0, the natural unitary action of U(d) on Sym⁡k(Cd) is irreducible.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: d≥1, k≥0, and the natural action U⊗k on the permutation-invariant subspace.

[F1]

U(d) is the group of d×d unitary matrices (Unitary Group Compact).

[F2]

Sym⁡k(Cd) is the range of the permutation-average projector; its vectors are exactly those fixed by every tensor-factor permutation (Symmetric Subspace Projector, The permutation average is the symmetric-subspace projector).

[L1]

Tensor products of finitely many linear maps defines U⊗k as the factorwise tensor map. The ordered register and permutation convention Ordered tensor registers, their inner product, and wire permutations shows on elementary tensors that this map commutes with each factor permutation. The tensor-map adjoint and composition identities Tensor maps preserve composition, identities, and adjoints make U⊗k a unitary representation when U is unitary. The QC02 interfaces are present as draft carriers.

Proof

1.1givenF2L1algebra

If k=0, the tensor unit is one-dimensional and the action is trivial, so the representation is irreducible. Suppose k≥1. Let e1,…,ed be the standard orthonormal basis of Cd. For each multi-index α=(α1,…,αd)∈Nd with ∑jαj=k, let Ωα be the set of words of length k in which j occurs αj times, and set vα=∣Ωα∣−1/2∑(i1,…,ik)∈Ωαei1⊗⋯⊗eik. The sets Ωα partition the elementary tensor basis, so the vα are orthonormal. A vector fixed by all permutations has equal coefficients on each permutation orbit Ωα; hence these vectors span exactly the symmetric subspace in [F2].

1.2givenF1algebra

Put t=(2k+1)−1 and D=diag⁡(eit,eit2,…,eitd)∈U(d). Each vα is an eigenvector of D⊗k with eigenvalue λα=ei∑jαjtj. These eigenvalues are distinct: for α≠β, let ℓ be the first index with cℓ:=αℓ−βℓ≠0. Then ∣cℓ∣tℓ≥tℓ, while ∣∑j>ℓcjtj∣≤ktℓ+1/(1−t)=tℓ/2; thus the phase difference is nonzero. Also ∣∑jcjtj∣≤kt/(1−t)=1/2<2π, so the phase difference is not a nonzero multiple of 2π.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2choosealgebra

Let W≠{0} be a subspace invariant under every U⊗k, and choose 0≠w=∑αcαvα∈W. At least one coefficient cα is nonzero. Because the eigenvalues in step 1.2 are distinct, the interpolation polynomial pα(z)=∏β≠α(z−λβ)/(λα−λβ) satisfies pα(D⊗k)w=cαvα. Invariance under D⊗k and linearity imply vα∈W. If d=1, step 1.1 has only the single multi-index (k), so this already gives W=Sym⁡k(C). Hence assume d≥2 in the transfer argument below.

3.1step 2.1F1L1choosealgebra

Fix indices i≠j with αi>0, let q>0 be sufficiently small, and set c=(1+q2)−1/2 and s=q(1+q2)−1/2, so c2+s2=1. The unitary rotation sending ei↦cei+sej, ej↦−sei+cej and fixing all other eℓ sends vα into the symmetric subspace by [L1]. The coefficient of vβ for β=α−ei+ej is the positive factor ∣Ωβ∣/∣Ωα∣ times scαi+αj−1P(q2),P(z)=∑r=0min⁡(αi−1,αj)(−1)r(αi−1r)(αj+1r+1)zr. This follows by counting which r output i-positions came from j and which r+1 output j-positions came from i in the tensor expansion. Since P(0)=αj+1>0 and P is a polynomial, choose q>0 small enough that P(q2)≠0. The rotated vector lies in W by invariance; applying the interpolation projection from step 2.1 for weight β isolates a nonzero multiple of vβ, so vβ∈W.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1algebra∎

Repeating step 3.1 transfers one unit from any coordinate with αi>βi to one with αj<βj. Any two nonnegative multi-indices of total k are connected by finitely many such transfers. Thus W contains every basis vector vβ from step 1.1 and equals Sym⁡k(Cd). Every nonzero invariant subspace is therefore the whole representation, proving irreducibility.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources