How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Quadratics in square ideals of colength greater than one
Statement
Assume AC and DC. If has colength greater than one and contains a nonzero polynomial of total degree at most two in , then is a scalar times the square of an affine linear polynomial. Infinite colength is allowed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , an ideal of colength greater than one, and a nonzero polynomial of total degree at most two.
def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function with domain satisfying for all . (The Axiom of Choice)
def-dependent-choice. Let be a set and let be a binary relation on . Call entire on when The Axiom of Dependent Choice, written , is the following statement. (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain)
def-derivation-algebra. Let be a homomorphism of commutative rings (def-commutative-ring), so that is an -algebra, and let be a -module (def-left-and-right-modules). (Derivation of an algebra)
def-kahler-differentials-algebra. Let be a homomorphism of commutative rings and let be the derivation functor of Derivation of an algebra. (Universal Kähler differential module)
lem-surface-p-basis-subfield-separation. Assume AC. Let have characteristic , and . Choose a possibly infinite -basis of , meaning its restricted monomials of finite support form a -basis. (Surface p basis subfield separation)
thm-regular-local-rings-are-domains-and-cohen-macaulay. Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). A regular local ring of dimension is a domain and Cohen–Macaulay. For every regular system , the tuple is -regular and is regular local of dimension for all . (regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay)
Proof
The two partial derivatives of lie in by the Leibniz rule, because and derivations of carry into ; if a nonzero constant were among these derivatives, then would contain a unit and the hypothesis of colength greater than one would fail.
Suppose a nonconstant linear derivative is nonzero; after an affine change of coordinates one has , and then either or with monic of degree at least two. Reducing an element of modulo shows that the coefficient of is divisible by and the part constant in is divisible by ; the degree bound on then forces both parts to vanish, leaving a constant times .
Remaining case: both partial derivatives vanish, so the characteristic is two and . A nonzero constant cannot lie in a proper . If only one variable occurs, normalize its quadratic coefficient to ; differentiating the remaining scalar coefficient gives a nonzero constant in unless its ratio to the quadratic coefficient is a square, in which case is already a scalar multiple of a square. Now suppose both variables occur and normalize . If and are both squares, then is a square. If and is nonsquare, the invertible coordinate change gives in characteristic two, reducing to the one-variable case just treated and contradicting its nonsquare alternative. Thus the remaining case has nonsquare.
Since is nonsquare, choose by [F5] a field derivation with , and extend it to by . Because derivations carry into , applying to gives ; put , so . Also , hence . The quotient has basis . As is a nonzero linear combination of these two regular-sequence generators, it is not in , so .
If contains a nonzero vector with zero -coefficient, then contains a nonzero affine linear polynomial, and the case of step 2.1 applies. Otherwise is one-dimensional and has colength three; extending scalars to an algebraic closure and translating makes , and the one-dimensional added ideal is spanned by with .
In the situation of step 5.1, makes that element a unit in the four-dimensional local algebra , while or makes its ideal contain two independent vectors, so the quotient would have length at most two; both contradict length three. Hence after the extension, whose square contains no nonzero polynomial of degree at most two, contradicting .
All cases are excluded except the one where is a scalar times the square of an affine linear polynomial, which proves the claim; infinite colength is allowed throughout because the arguments use only the two generators of the relevant ideals.
Remarks
- The statement is the characteristic-two square-root step of the resolution argument; the derivation of step 1.3 is the only place a -basis is used.
- All reductions are affine changes of coordinates and scalar extensions, both of which preserve the shape of a polynomial of degree at most two.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Resolution of Surfaces, Lemma 54.12.1, with the characteristic-two colength calculation supplied (standard reference, not scraped)