Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Quadratics in square ideals of colength greater than one

Statement

Assume AC and DC. If I⊂κ[x,y] has colength greater than one and contains a nonzero polynomial q of total degree at most two in I2, then q is a scalar times the square of an affine linear polynomial. Infinite colength is allowed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field κ, an ideal I⊂κ[x,y] of colength greater than one, and a nonzero polynomial q∈I2 of total degree at most two.

[F1]

def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set F all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function g with domain F satisfying g(S)∈S for all S∈F. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F2]

def-dependent-choice. Let X be a set and let R⊆X×X be a binary relation on X. Call R entire on X when for every x∈X there is y∈X with xRy. The Axiom of Dependent Choice, written DC, is the following statement. (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain)

[F3]

def-derivation-algebra. Let A→φB be a homomorphism of commutative rings (def-commutative-ring), so that B is an A-algebra, and let M be a B-module (def-left-and-right-modules). (Derivation of an algebra)

[F4]

def-kahler-differentials-algebra. Let A→φB be a homomorphism of commutative rings and let Der⁡A(B,−) be the derivation functor of Derivation of an algebra. (Universal Kähler differential module)

[F5]

lem-surface-p-basis-subfield-separation. Assume AC. Let k have characteristic p>0, A=k[ ⁣[X1,…,Xn] ⁣][Y1,…,Ym] and K=Frac⁡A. Choose a possibly infinite p-basis (bi)i∈I of k/kp, meaning its restricted monomials of finite support form a kp-basis. (Surface p basis subfield separation)

[F6]

thm-regular-local-rings-are-domains-and-cohen-macaulay. Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). A regular local ring R of dimension d is a domain and Cohen–Macaulay. For every regular system (x1,…,xd), the tuple is R-regular and R/(x1,…,xc) is regular local of dimension d−c for all 0≤c≤d. (regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay)

Proof

1.1F3F4given

The two partial derivatives of q lie in I by the Leibniz rule, because q∈I2 and derivations of κ[x,y] carry I2 into I; if a nonzero constant were among these derivatives, then I would contain a unit and the hypothesis of colength greater than one would fail.

2.1F3F4step 1.1

Suppose a nonconstant linear derivative is nonzero; after an affine change of coordinates one has x∈I, and then either I=(x) or I=(x,F(y)) with F monic of degree at least two. Reducing an element of I2 modulo x2 shows that the coefficient of x is divisible by F and the part constant in x is divisible by F2; the degree bound on q then forces both parts to vanish, leaving q= a constant times x2.

3.1F5step 2.1

Remaining case: both partial derivatives vanish, so the characteristic is two and q=a+dx2+fy2. A nonzero constant cannot lie in a proper I2. If only one variable occurs, normalize its quadratic coefficient to 1; differentiating the remaining scalar coefficient gives a nonzero constant in I unless its ratio to the quadratic coefficient is a square, in which case q is already a scalar multiple of a square. Now suppose both variables occur and normalize f=1. If a and d are both squares, then q is a square. If d=s2 and a is nonsquare, the invertible coordinate change z=y+sx gives q=a+z2 in characteristic two, reducing to the one-variable case just treated and contradicting its nonsquare alternative. Thus the remaining case has d nonsquare.

4.1F3F5F6step 3.1

Since d is nonsquare, choose by [F5] a field derivation θ with θ(d)≠0, and extend it to κ[x,y] by θ(x)=θ(y)=0. Because derivations carry I2 into I, applying θ to q gives θ(a)+θ(d)x2∈I; put α=θ(a)/θ(d), so x2+α∈I. Also q+d(x2+α)=y2+a+dα∈I, hence J=(x2+α, y2+a+dα)⊆I. The quotient κ[x,y]/J has basis 1,x,y,xy. As q is a nonzero linear combination of these two regular-sequence generators, it is not in J2, so I/J≠0.

5.1F5F6step 4.1

If I/J contains a nonzero vector with zero xy-coefficient, then I contains a nonzero affine linear polynomial, and the case of step 2.1 applies. Otherwise I/J is one-dimensional and I has colength three; extending scalars to an algebraic closure and translating makes J=(x2,y2), and the one-dimensional added ideal is spanned by g+hx+iy+jxy with j≠0.

6.1F6step 5.1

In the situation of step 5.1, g≠0 makes that element a unit in the four-dimensional local algebra κ[x,y]/(x2,y2), while h≠0 or i≠0 makes its ideal contain two independent vectors, so the quotient would have length at most two; both contradict length three. Hence I=(x2,xy,y2) after the extension, whose square contains no nonzero polynomial of degree at most two, contradicting q∈I2.

7.1F1F2step 6.1∎

All cases are excluded except the one where q is a scalar times the square of an affine linear polynomial, which proves the claim; infinite colength is allowed throughout because the arguments use only the two generators of the relevant ideals.

Remarks

  • The statement is the characteristic-two square-root step of the resolution argument; the derivation of step 1.3 is the only place a p-basis is used.
  • All reductions are affine changes of coordinates and scalar extensions, both of which preserve the shape of a polynomial of degree at most two.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources