How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Complete quotients of a quadratic irrational lie in a finite state space
Statement
Let be a quadratic irrational, and let be the complete quotients produced by the continued-fraction algorithm. Then only finitely many distinct complete quotients occur.
More precisely, if with and discriminant , then for every the complete quotient is a root of an integer quadratic equation whose discriminant is also .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A quadratic irrational and its complete quotients .
A quadratic irrational is an irrational real root of some quadratic equation with and . (Quadratic irrationals).
An irrational real number never terminates under the continued-fraction algorithm, so every complete quotient is defined (The continued-fraction algorithm terminates exactly on rational numbers).
For every one has (Complete-quotient tail formula).
Consecutive convergents satisfy (Determinant identity for consecutive convergents).
The convergent errors satisfy (Convergent error bound).
The convergent denominators satisfy , , and with , so for every (Convergents of a regular continued fraction).
Proof
By [F1], after multiplying by a common denominator we may choose integers. [F1, given, algebra] with and Its discriminant is positive because is real and nonsquare because is irrational.
Because is irrational, [F2] says the continued-fraction algorithm. [F2, F3, algebra] never terminates, so every is defined. For each , substituting the expression from [F3] into the quadratic equation from step 1.1 and clearing denominators yields where These coefficients are integers.
The discriminant of that quadratic is. [step 2.1, F4, algebra] because [F4] gives
Put. [F5, F6, step 1.1, algebra] Facts [F5] and [F6] give Since , the coefficient from step 2.1 becomes because . Therefore so only finitely many integers can occur as .
For , the formulas in step 2.1 give , so the integers. [step 2.1, step 3.2, step 3.1, algebra] also range over a finite set. Then step 3.1 yields so only finitely many integers can occur as well. Thus only finitely many triples arise, and each with is one of the at most two roots of one of those finitely many quadratics. Together with the single value , this proves that only finitely many complete quotients occur.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Hackman, Elementary Number Theory (standard reference, not scraped)
- Bruce Ikenaga, Periodic Continued Fractions (standard reference, not scraped)