How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Rank-one cohomology shifts across a simple wall
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a simple root and , and put . If , then for every there is a natural -equivariant isomorphism where . If then and for all . Consequently for every : if the displayed isomorphism holds, while if then for all .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, the group , its Borel , the flag variety , a simple root with minimal parabolic and projection , a weight , and the number .
The projection , , is a surjective morphism which is a Zariski-locally trivial fibre bundle with fibre , trivialized over the single -translates of the open torsor chart and covering by finitely many of them; left translation by permutes these charts (A minimal-parabolic flag projection is a projective-line bundle, Minimal parabolic from one negative simple root).
Under the fixed identification of the fibre with , the restriction is isomorphic to ; in particular the fibre degree of for is the constant integer (Flag line-bundle degree on a minimal-parabolic fiber).
The relative canonical line bundle of satisfies , -equivariantly, and its fibre degree is (Relative canonical weight for a minimal-parabolic flag projection).
The canonical identifications and are -equivariant (The equivariant line bundle associated to a Borel character).
Let be a Zariski locally trivial -bundle of complex schemes and an invertible sheaf of constant geometric fibre degree , with relative canonical bundle . After the invariant apolarity normalization of the relative cohomology computation, there is for every an isomorphism , natural in and under restriction of ; when both sides of the underlying relative isomorphism are handled by the same statement with the zero sheaf identification (Relative projective-line cohomology shift, Relative projective-line cohomology and apolarity, Leray spectral sequence for sheaf cohomology).
For a smooth projective complex scheme of pure dimension and a locally free sheaf , the groups vanish outside ; here (Serre duality for locally free sheaves on a smooth projective variety, A semisimple flag variety is smooth and projective).
The equivariant structure induces for every a linear action of on , and every natural isomorphism of equivariant bundles induces a -equivariant map on cohomology (The cohomology of a Borel-character line bundle is a rational G-module).
The dot action is , the simple reflection acts by and is an involution, and (Dot-Weyl facets and single-wall translation data, Root reflections and the Weyl group action, The Weyl vector in fundamental coordinates).
Proof
Compute the dot translate: by [F8], since . Therefore [F3] and [F4] give a -equivariant isomorphism .
Suppose . Apply [F5] to the -bundle and the invertible sheaf , whose fibre degree is the constant integer by [F2], writing : for every there is an isomorphism , which by step 1.1 is an isomorphism . This isomorphism is -equivariant: is -equivariant by [F1], so each gives an automorphism of the bundle data covering the induced automorphism of , and the naturality clause of [F5] identifies the two pullback isomorphisms, which is exactly the equivariance with respect to the action of [F7].
Suppose . Then step 1.1 gives , and step 2.1 gives for every . By [F6] one has for ; applying the isomorphism successively to gives for all .
Finally suppose and put . By step 1.1, , and because the dot action is an action of [F8]. Applying the first clause of the Statement, already proved in step 2.1, to in place of gives for all , which is the asserted reformulation.
Depends on
- Relative projective-line cohomology shift
- Relative projective-line cohomology and apolarity
- Leray spectral sequence for sheaf cohomology
- A minimal-parabolic flag projection is a projective-line bundle
- Minimal parabolic from one negative simple root
- Flag line-bundle degree on a minimal-parabolic fiber
- Relative canonical weight for a minimal-parabolic flag projection
- The cohomology of a Borel-character line bundle is a rational G-module
- The equivariant line bundle associated to a Borel character
- Complex semisimple algebraic group, Borel, and flag variety
- A semisimple flag variety is smooth and projective
- Serre duality for locally free sheaves on a smooth projective variety
- Dot-Weyl facets and single-wall translation data
- Root reflections and the Weyl group action
- The Weyl vector in fundamental coordinates
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
85 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jacob Lurie, A Proof of the Borel-Weil-Bott Theorem (standard reference, not scraped)
- Xiong Rui, Borel-Weil and Borel-Weil-Bott, Lecture 1 (standard reference, not scraped)