Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rank-one cohomology shifts across a simple wall

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let α be a simple root and λ∈X∗(T), and put n=⟨λ,α∨⟩. If n≥−1, then for every i≥0 there is a natural G-equivariant isomorphism Hi(X,Lλ)≅Hi+1(X,Lsα⋅λ), where sα⋅λ=sα(λ+ρ)−ρ. If n=−1 then sα⋅λ=λ and Hi(X,Lλ)=0 for all i≥0. Consequently for every λ: if ⟨λ,α∨⟩≥−1 the displayed isomorphism holds, while if ⟨λ,α∨⟩≤−1 then Hi+1(X,Lλ)≅Hi(X,Lsα⋅λ) for all i≥0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, the group G, its Borel B, the flag variety X=G/B, a simple root α with minimal parabolic Pα and projection f:X→Xα=G/Pα, a weight λ, and the number n=⟨λ,α∨⟩.

[F1]

The projection f:XB→Xα, g[vB]↦g[vα], is a surjective morphism which is a Zariski-locally trivial fibre bundle with fibre Pα/B≅P1, trivialized over the single G-translates of the open torsor chart and covering Xα by finitely many of them; left translation by G permutes these charts (A minimal-parabolic flag projection is a projective-line bundle, Minimal parabolic from one negative simple root).

[F2]

Under the fixed identification of the fibre F=Pα[vB] with P1, the restriction Lλ∣F is isomorphic to OP1(n); in particular the fibre degree of Lλ for f is the constant integer n=⟨λ,α∨⟩ (Flag line-bundle degree on a minimal-parabolic fiber).

[F3]

The relative canonical line bundle of f satisfies ωXB/Xα≅L−α, G-equivariantly, and its fibre degree is −2 (Relative canonical weight for a minimal-parabolic flag projection).

[F4]

The canonical identifications Lλ⊗Lμ≅Lλ+μ and Lλ∨≅L−λ are G-equivariant (The equivariant line bundle associated to a Borel character).

[F5]

Let π:E→S be a Zariski locally trivial P1-bundle of complex schemes and L an invertible sheaf of constant geometric fibre degree n≥−1, with relative canonical bundle Kπ=ωE/S. After the invariant apolarity normalization of the relative cohomology computation, there is for every i≥0 an isomorphism Hi(E,L)≅Hi+1(E,L⊗Kπ⊗(n+1)), natural in (E/S,L) and under restriction of S; when n=−1 both sides of the underlying relative isomorphism are handled by the same statement with the zero sheaf identification (Relative projective-line cohomology shift, Relative projective-line cohomology and apolarity, Leray spectral sequence for sheaf cohomology).

[F6]

For a smooth projective complex scheme X of pure dimension N and a locally free sheaf E, the groups Hq(X,E) vanish outside 0≤q≤N; here dim⁡X=∣Φ+∣=N (Serre duality for locally free sheaves on a smooth projective variety, A semisimple flag variety is smooth and projective).

[F7]

The equivariant structure induces for every i≥0 a linear action of G on Hi(X,Lλ), and every natural isomorphism of equivariant bundles induces a G-equivariant map on cohomology (The cohomology of a Borel-character line bundle is a rational G-module).

[F8]

The dot action is w⋅λ=w(λ+ρ)−ρ, the simple reflection acts by sα(μ)=μ−⟨μ,α∨⟩α and is an involution, and ⟨ρ,α∨⟩=1 (Dot-Weyl facets and single-wall translation data, Root reflections and the Weyl group action, The Weyl vector in fundamental coordinates).

Proof

1.1F3F4F8givenalgebra

Compute the dot translate: sα⋅λ=sα(λ+ρ)−ρ=λ+ρ−(n+1)α−ρ=λ−(n+1)α by [F8], since ⟨λ+ρ,α∨⟩=n+1. Therefore [F3] and [F4] give a G-equivariant isomorphism Lsα⋅λ=Lλ−(n+1)α≅Lλ⊗L−α⊗(n+1)≅Lλ⊗ωXB/Xα⊗(n+1).

2.1F1F2F5F7step 1.1algebra

Suppose n≥−1. Apply [F5] to the P1-bundle f:XB→Xα and the invertible sheaf L=Lλ, whose fibre degree is the constant integer n by [F2], writing Kπ=ωXB/Xα: for every i≥0 there is an isomorphism Hi(XB,Lλ)≅Hi+1(XB,Lλ⊗Kπ⊗(n+1)), which by step 1.1 is an isomorphism Hi(XB,Lλ)≅Hi+1(XB,Lsα⋅λ). This isomorphism is G-equivariant: f is G-equivariant by [F1], so each g∈G gives an automorphism of the bundle data (f:XB→Xα,Lλ) covering the induced automorphism of Xα, and the naturality clause of [F5] identifies the two pullback isomorphisms, which is exactly the equivariance with respect to the action of [F7].

3.1F2F6step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Suppose n=−1. Then step 1.1 gives sα⋅λ=λ, and step 2.1 gives Hi(XB,Lλ)≅Hi+1(XB,Lλ) for every i≥0. By [F6] one has Hq(XB,Lλ)=0 for q>N=∣Φ+∣; applying the isomorphism successively to i=N,N−1,…,0 gives Hq(XB,Lλ)=0 for all q≥0.

4.1F8step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Finally suppose n≤−1 and put λ′=sα⋅λ. By step 1.1, ⟨λ′,α∨⟩=⟨λ−(n+1)α,α∨⟩=n−2(n+1)=−n−2≥−1, and sα⋅λ′=sα⋅(sα⋅λ)=λ because the dot action is an action of W [F8]. Applying the first clause of the Statement, already proved in step 2.1, to λ′ in place of λ gives Hi(XB,Lsα⋅λ)≅Hi+1(XB,Lλ) for all i≥0, which is the asserted reformulation.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

85 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources