How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Holonomic phase residuals control distance to the consistent phase manifold
Statement
Fix a compact regular configuration chart from Regular holonomic phase space and constrained dynamics and a compact momentum set. Use the Euclidean norm on for phase-state differences. Each point of its consistent phase set has a neighborhood with a smooth retraction such that is the identity on and A finite number of these neighborhoods cover the compact phase set, so one constant works for all of them. In particular, residuals of sizes and admit a consistent restoration at distance , uniformly on the chart.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A compact regular chart, compact momentum set, and the smooth full-row-rank constraint data in the Statement.
Regular holonomic phase space and constrained dynamics: , is uniformly invertible on the compact chart, and means and .
The parametrized implicit function theorem with regularity: an invertible square derivative block gives a unique local graph for a zero-set equation; since is smooth, its local graph is smooth.
The chain rule for total derivatives: : derivatives of a composite are obtained by composing the derivatives.
On a convex open set, a uniform bound implies : a uniform derivative bound on a convex neighborhood gives the corresponding Lipschitz bound.
Proof
At a point of the compact regular chart , permute coordinates as so is an invertible block. Apply [F2] for each finite regularity order; uniqueness makes these graphs agree locally, so the graph is smooth. Write and . Since and both kernels have dimension , .
After shrinking to a convex coordinate neighborhood, remains invertible and . Set . Then and the derivative of has norm at most . The mean-value inequality [F4] gives . Since , it follows that . Compactness makes the constant uniform on a finite chart cover.
For , put and define . Positive definiteness of and injectivity of make invertible; its smooth entries and positive determinant give a smooth inverse by . Then and . Since and both have dimension and the latter is contained in the former, for a unique .
The identity and [F1] imply . The momentum set is bounded and is locally Lipschitz, so step 2.1 bounds the right side by . Thus has the asserted distance bound and lies in . If , then and the formula for returns , so is the identity there. By [F3] the coordinate formula is smooth, and it is the identity on the consistent phase set in this neighborhood. Shrink the finitely many neighborhoods so their closures lie in an open regular set; continuity keeps and the required derivatives uniformly bounded there. A finite subcover gives finitely many such local retractions and a uniform constant.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ernst Hairer, Christian Lubich, and Gerhard Wanner, Geometric Numerical Integration, 2nd ed., Chapter VII.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Robert I. McLachlan, Klas Modin, Olivier Verdier, and Matt Wilkins, Geometric Generalisations of SHAKE and RATTLE, Foundations of Computational Mathematics 14 (2014), 339–370 (standard reference, not scraped)