How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Regular holonomic phase space and constrained dynamics
Definition
Let be open, let be smooth (that is, ) with , let be a constant symmetric positive-definite matrix, and let be smooth. A holonomic constraint is the position condition . Write , let , and define its regular part by . For , is positive definite. On a compact regular chart , is uniformly bounded: .
A position-momentum pair is consistent when and . The regular constrained phase manifold is The ambient canonical two-form is ; its restriction to is denoted .
For , the constrained Hamilton equations are with multiplier Here has components . This multiplier is the one that keeps both and satisfied.
Used by
- Scaled classical RATTLE step map Definition
- Nearly dependent constraints make the multiplier solve ill conditioned Example
- RATTLE gives an exact step and a cubic phase defect for a free rigid bond Example
- The constrained pendulum multiplier follows from tangency Example
- Holonomic phase residuals control distance to the consistent phase manifold Lemma
- The regular holonomic phase space is a symplectic cotangent bundle Lemma
- Exact RATTLE has second order global accuracy on compact tubes Theorem
- Exact RATTLE is symplectic on the constrained phase space Theorem
- Exact RATTLE preserves both constraints and is symmetric Theorem
- Scaled RATTLE residuals bound the finite solve trajectory error Theorem
- The constrained Hamiltonian vector field has a unique local flow Theorem
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- Ernst Hairer, Christian Lubich, and Gerhard Wanner, Geometric Numerical Integration, 2nd ed., Chapter VII.1, §§VII.1.1–VII.1.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Robert I. McLachlan, Klas Modin, Olivier Verdier, and Matt Wilkins, Geometric Generalisations of SHAKE and RATTLE, Foundations of Computational Mathematics 14 (2014), 339–370 (standard reference, not scraped)