Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

RATTLE gives an exact step and a cubic phase defect for a free rigid bond

Example

Let M=mI2, m,ℓ,ω>0, V=0, and c(q)=(∥q∥22−ℓ2)/2. Start from q0=(ℓ,0) and p0=(0,mωℓ), and take 0<hω≤12. The selected exact RATTLE step has q1=ℓ(1−h2ω2,hω),p1=mωℓ(−hω,1−h2ω2). Its position constraint and momentum tangency are exact. The exact constrained flow rotates by angle hω, whereas RATTLE rotates by arcsin⁡(hω), so the one-step phase defect is O(h3) as hω→0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: M=mI2, the circle constraint, the free-particle potential, initial data, and step range in the Example.

[F1]

Regular holonomic phase space and constrained dynamics: consistency is c(q)=0 and qTM−1p=0.

[F2]

Scaled classical RATTLE step map: the exact position and momentum updates use the two force-level multipliers and impose c(q1)=0 and q1TM−1p1=0.

[F3]

The constrained Hamiltonian vector field has a unique local flow: consistent data evolve by q˙=M−1p and p˙=−∇V−JTλ.

[F4]

Multivariable Taylor formula with a Lagrange remainder along a line segment: a C3 scalar function on a convex interval has its degree-two Taylor polynomial with a cubic Lagrange remainder.

Verification

1.1givenF1F2algebra

The initial data are consistent because ∥q0∥2=ℓ and q0Tp0=0. The position multiplier equation gives q1=q0+hm(p0−hλq0); choosing λ=m(1−1−h2ω2)/h2=mω2/(1+1−h2ω2) yields the stated q1, whose squared norm is ℓ2. This multiplier tends to mω2/2, the position branch center.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

With μ=λ, the final RATTLE equation gives the stated p1; μ has the same limit mω2/2, so the unique local branch selects this root. Direct multiplication gives q1Tp1=0 and ∥p1∥2=mωℓ, so both exact constraints hold.

3.1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

The continuous multiplier is λc=mω2, hence the exact flow is q(t)=ℓ(cos⁡ωt,sin⁡ωt) and p(t)=mωℓ(−sin⁡ωt,cos⁡ωt). This solves [F3] and agrees with the initial data. The RATTLE position angle is θh=arcsin⁡(hω). Taylor's theorem [F4] on 0≤hω≤1/2 gives arcsin⁡(hω)−hω=O((hω)3). Since ω is fixed, the angle defect is O(h3) as stated.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources