How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
RATTLE gives an exact step and a cubic phase defect for a free rigid bond
Example
Let , , , and . Start from and , and take . The selected exact RATTLE step has Its position constraint and momentum tangency are exact. The exact constrained flow rotates by angle , whereas RATTLE rotates by , so the one-step phase defect is as .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the circle constraint, the free-particle potential, initial data, and step range in the Example.
Regular holonomic phase space and constrained dynamics: consistency is and .
Scaled classical RATTLE step map: the exact position and momentum updates use the two force-level multipliers and impose and .
The constrained Hamiltonian vector field has a unique local flow: consistent data evolve by and .
Multivariable Taylor formula with a Lagrange remainder along a line segment: a scalar function on a convex interval has its degree-two Taylor polynomial with a cubic Lagrange remainder.
Verification
The initial data are consistent because and . The position multiplier equation gives ; choosing yields the stated , whose squared norm is . This multiplier tends to , the position branch center.
With , the final RATTLE equation gives the stated ; has the same limit , so the unique local branch selects this root. Direct multiplication gives and , so both exact constraints hold.
The continuous multiplier is , hence the exact flow is and . This solves [F3] and agrees with the initial data. The RATTLE position angle is . Taylor's theorem [F4] on gives . Since is fixed, the angle defect is as stated.
Depends on
- Regular holonomic phase space and constrained dynamics
- Scaled classical RATTLE step map
- Scaled RATTLE equations have unique local multiplier branches
- The constrained Hamiltonian vector field has a unique local flow
- Exact RATTLE preserves both constraints and is symmetric
- Exact RATTLE has second order global accuracy on compact tubes
- Multivariable Taylor formula with a Lagrange remainder along a line segment
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ernst Hairer, Christian Lubich, and Gerhard Wanner, Geometric Numerical Integration, 2nd ed., Chapter VII.1.4, pp. 245–246 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Robert I. McLachlan, Klas Modin, Olivier Verdier, and Matt Wilkins, Geometric Generalisations of SHAKE and RATTLE, Foundations of Computational Mathematics 14 (2014), 339–370 (standard reference, not scraped)