How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The constrained Hamiltonian vector field has a unique local flow
Statement
Assume the hypotheses of Regular holonomic phase space and constrained dynamics on a compact regular chart . For every consistent initial pair with there is a unique local solution of with as defined there. The solution remains in throughout its local interval.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A compact regular chart, a consistent initial pair , and the constrained equations in the Statement.
Regular holonomic phase space and constrained dynamics: for , is uniformly invertible, and consistency means and .
The regular holonomic phase space is a symplectic cotangent bundle: the consistent phase set is a smooth manifold with local cotangent coordinates.
Picard-Lindelöf local existence and uniqueness for first-order systems: a locally Lipschitz vector field on an open Euclidean domain has a unique local solution through each initial point.
Proof
Since has full row rank and is SPD, for every nonzero we have . Thus is invertible; its entries are smooth and , so its inverse and the displayed multiplier are smooth on a neighborhood of the chart.
Extend the formula in [F1] to an open neighborhood of on which remains invertible and define the ambient vector field . It is smooth, hence locally Lipschitz, so [F3] gives a unique local solution through . Shrink its time interval so stays in that neighborhood.
Along this solution, the chain rule gives and , where . Since the second constraint starts at zero, it remains zero; the first derivative is therefore zero and also remains zero. The chosen neighborhood is regular, and [F2] identifies its consistent constraint set as a smooth phase manifold, so the trajectory stays in .
The local uniqueness from [F3] applies to every solution of the same ambient extension, so in particular the constrained solution is unique.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ernst Hairer, Christian Lubich, and Gerhard Wanner, Geometric Numerical Integration, 2nd ed., Chapter VII.1, §§VII.1.1–VII.1.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Robert I. McLachlan, Klas Modin, Olivier Verdier, and Matt Wilkins, Geometric Generalisations of SHAKE and RATTLE, Foundations of Computational Mathematics 14 (2014), 339–370 (standard reference, not scraped)