How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A residual vanishing through order has a scaled extension
Statement
Let be open, let , let with , and let . Let be . Suppose for every and . Then , initially defined for , has a extension to . Its mixed derivatives at zero satisfy
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.
Multivariable Taylor formula with a Lagrange remainder along a line segment: a map on a convex neighborhood has its degree- Taylor polynomial with a remainder of order along each line.
The chain rule for total derivatives: : differentiating a composition with a coordinate line gives the corresponding directional derivative.
On a convex open set, a uniform bound implies : on a convex interval, a derivative bound gives the corresponding scalar increment bound.
Proof
For each parameter multi-index with , iteratively apply the chain rule [F2] to the identities . Thus for every , as needed below.
For each parameter multi-index with , put , , and . For every , put . If , apply [F1] componentwise to through degree ; continuity of its highest derivative lets us replace the Lagrange coefficient at by its value at zero plus . If , subtract the linear Taylor polynomial: the derivative of the remainder is by continuity, so [F3] gives a remainder . Thus in every case equals its Taylor polynomial through degree plus . By step 1.1 all coefficients of degrees below vanish. For , the quotient rule expresses the th derivative of as a finite linear combination of , . Substituting the expansions shows that the remainder terms are ; the polynomial part has a continuous extension whose th derivative at zero is . Continuity of the derivatives on compact parameter neighborhoods makes these limits locally uniform in .
Define the value at by the displayed limit formula. For each , step 2.1 gives a locally uniform limit for the corresponding derivative as ; at these formulas are differentiable in because is , and their -derivatives agree with the next displayed coefficient. Induction on total derivative order therefore shows that all mixed partial derivatives through order exist and are continuous across . The extension is with the asserted formula.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ernst Hairer, Christian Lubich, and Gerhard Wanner, Geometric Numerical Integration, 2nd ed., Chapter VII.1, §§VII.1.1–VII.1.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Robert I. McLachlan, Klas Modin, Olivier Verdier, and Matt Wilkins, Geometric Generalisations of SHAKE and RATTLE, Foundations of Computational Mathematics 14 (2014), 339–370 (standard reference, not scraped)