Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The centralizer of C[Sn−1] in C[Sn] is commutative

Statement

Let Z(C[Sn],C[Sn−1])={z∈C[Sn]:zh=hz for every h∈Sn−1} be the centralizer of the subalgebra C[Sn−1] in C[Sn]. Then Z(C[Sn],C[Sn−1]) is a commutative subalgebra of C[Sn].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer n≥1, the group Sn=Sym⁡({1,…,n}) with its subgroup Sn−1=Sym⁡({1,…,n−1}) of permutations fixing n, and the group algebra C[Sn] with basis {[g]:g∈Sn} and multiplication [g][h]=[gh] (Partitions, English diagrams, and conjugation, The symmetric group Sym⁡(X): the bijections of a set X under composition, The group ring R[G] is a unital R-algebra with basis G, and each g∈G is a unit of R[G]).

[F1]

For every g∈Sn there is an involution hg∈Sn−1 with hgghg−1=g−1; the proof of the cited lemma exhibits hg by explicit formulas on the cycles of g (Every element of Sn is inverted by an involution of Sn−1).

[F2]

C[Sn] has the group elements as a C-basis, every element has a unique expansion ∑gcg[g] with finitely many nonzero coefficients, and [g][h]=[gh]; coefficients of equal basis elements are equal. The inverse in Sn reverses products: (gh)−1=h−1g−1 (The group ring R[G] is a unital R-algebra with basis G, and each g∈G is a unit of R[G], The symmetric group Sym⁡(X): the bijections of a set X under composition).

Proof

technique · inversion anti-automorphism
1.1F2givenalgebra

The centralizer C:=Z(C[Sn],C[Sn−1]) is a C-subalgebra of C[Sn]: it contains 1, is closed under addition and scalar multiplication because equality with each h∈Sn−1 is preserved by these operations, and is closed under multiplication because yz h=y hz=h yz for all h∈Sn−1 whenever y,z∈C; closure under multiplication is also checked on the basis expansions using [F2].

1.2F2givenalgebra

Define σ:C[Sn]→C[Sn] on the basis by σ([g]):=[g−1] and extend C-linearly: σ(∑gcg[g])=∑gcg[g−1]. Then σ is an involution, since (g−1)−1=g, and it is an anti-automorphism: σ([g][h])=σ([gh])=[(gh)−1]=[h−1g−1]=[h−1][g−1]=σ([h])σ([g]) by [F2], and the identity extends to all elements by bilinearity.

2.1step 1.2F1F2algebra

The anti-automorphism σ fixes every element of C. Let z=∑gcg[g]∈C, and fix one g∈Sn. By [F1] there is hg∈Sn−1 with hgghg−1=g−1. Since z=hgzhg−1, comparison of the coefficient of [g−1] on the two sides gives cg−1=cg; conjugation is a bijection, so exactly the summand indexed by g contributes on the right. This equality holds for every g, and therefore σ(z)=z by [F2]. The argument compares each coefficient separately and requires no common conjugator.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

For y,z∈C we have yz=σ(yz)=σ(z)σ(y)=zy: the first equality is step 2.1, the second holds because σ is an anti-automorphism by step 1.2, and the third is step 2.1 applied to y and to z. Hence C is a commutative subalgebra of C[Sn] by step 1.1.

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources