How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The centralizer of in is commutative
Statement
Let be the centralizer of the subalgebra in . Then is a commutative subalgebra of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer , the group with its subgroup of permutations fixing , and the group algebra with basis and multiplication (Partitions, English diagrams, and conjugation, The symmetric group : the bijections of a set under composition, The group ring is a unital -algebra with basis , and each is a unit of ).
For every there is an involution with ; the proof of the cited lemma exhibits by explicit formulas on the cycles of (Every element of is inverted by an involution of ).
has the group elements as a -basis, every element has a unique expansion with finitely many nonzero coefficients, and ; coefficients of equal basis elements are equal. The inverse in reverses products: (The group ring is a unital -algebra with basis , and each is a unit of , The symmetric group : the bijections of a set under composition).
Proof
The centralizer is a -subalgebra of : it contains , is closed under addition and scalar multiplication because equality with each is preserved by these operations, and is closed under multiplication because for all whenever ; closure under multiplication is also checked on the basis expansions using [F2].
Define on the basis by and extend -linearly: . Then is an involution, since , and it is an anti-automorphism: by [F2], and the identity extends to all elements by bilinearity.
The anti-automorphism fixes every element of . Let , and fix one . By [F1] there is with . Since , comparison of the coefficient of on the two sides gives ; conjugation is a bijection, so exactly the summand indexed by contributes on the right. This equality holds for every , and therefore by [F2]. The argument compares each coefficient separately and requires no common conjugator.
For we have : the first equality is step 2.1, the second holds because is an anti-automorphism by step 1.2, and the third is step 2.1 applied to and to . Hence is a commutative subalgebra of by step 1.1.
Remarks
-
Choice-free. The element is constructed in Every element of is inverted by an involution of by reversing the cycles of , so no selection principle is used; the argument also avoids Maschke's theorem and any semisimplicity input, and works verbatim with replaced by any commutative ring.
-
What the centralizer contains. The centre and the element both lie in : elements of the centre commute with , and conjugating by gives , so conjugation permutes the summands of . The opposite inclusion, that is generated by these two pieces, is The relative centralizer is generated by the previous centre and the last Jucys-Murphy element.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.