Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Scaling identities for kernel moments and derivatives

Statement

For the scaled kernels of Scaled symmetric compactly supported kernel family and every ε>0, supp W_ε⊂\overline B(0,Rε), ∫W_ε=1, ∫zW_ε(z)dz=0, and ∫|z|²W_ε(z)dz=ε²m₂. Pointwise, ∇W_ε(z)=ε^(−d−1)∇W(z/ε) and D²W_ε(z)=ε^(−d−2)D²W(z/ε); consequently their sup norms equal ε^(−d−1)M₁ and ε^(−d−2)M₂.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The admissible kernel W and a scale ε>0.

[F1]

Scaled symmetric compactly supported kernel family: W_ε(z)=ε^(−d)W(z/ε), supp W⊂\overline B(0,R), and the constants M₁, M₂, m₂ are finite.

[F3]

A compactly supported Riemann integrand admits the global change-of-variables formula from a diffeomorphism near the relevant compact preimage: let U⊂R^d be open and T:U→R^d be injective C¹ with invertible derivative. If f:R^d→R is compactly supported Riemann integrable with supp(f)⊂T(U), then ∫{R^d}f(y)dy=∫{R^d}h(x)dx, where h(x)=f(T(x))|det DT(x)| on U and h=0 outside U. Here U=R^d and T(u)=εu is onto R^d for ε>0.

[F4]

A continuous real function on a compact Jordan measurable set is Riemann integrable over that set: continuous real integrands on compact Jordan boxes are Riemann integrable.

[F5]

The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a): derivatives of compositions with the affine scaling map are given by the chain rule.

Proof

1.1F1F5algebra

If W_ε(z)≠0 then z/ε∈supp W, so |z|≤Rε. The chain rule in [F5] applied to ε^(−d)W(z/ε) gives the displayed pointwise first and second derivative formulas; taking suprema and substituting u=z/ε gives the claimed derivative sup norms.

2.1F1F2F3F4∎

The functions W_ε, zW_ε, and |z|²W_ε are continuous and compactly supported, hence integrable on a bounding box by [F4]. In the integrals, the affine substitution z=εu has Jacobian determinant ε^d. Thus ∫W_ε=∫W=1, ∫zW_ε(z)dz=ε∫uW(u)du=0 by [F2], and ∫|z|²W_ε(z)dz=ε²∫|u|²W(u)du=ε²m₂.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources