How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Elementwise P1 product-cutoff energy estimate
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let and let be a nondegenerate affine -simplex in a shape-regular mesh with . Let . Let be the affine function whose values at the vertices of are the nodal values of . There is a constant depending only on and the shape regularity bound such that
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, a nondegenerate affine simplex from a shape-regular family, and two affine scalar functions on .
Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity gives each cell as a nondegenerate affine simplex with affinely independent vertices . Thus there are unique barycentric affine functions satisfying and ; these are the P1 nodal basis functions used below.
Under Countable Choice, Shape regularity controls affine simplex geometry: for simplex diameter , each barycentric basis function satisfies , and affine maps have uniform volume scaling under the shape-regularity bound.
Finite dimensional norm equivalence over a complete valued field: on the fixed reference simplex the coordinate maximum of a P1 polynomial's vertex values is bounded by a constant times its norm; affine scaling transfers this as .
Proof
Write the vertices as , their barycentric coordinates as , and set and . Since , For each , . Affineness gives and . Applying [F2] to the barycentric gradients therefore gives pointwise
By [F3], the two vertex maxima in step 1.1 are at most and , respectively. The gradients of affine functions are constant on , so multiplying the pointwise estimate by yields which is the asserted estimate.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jinchao Xu, Iterative Methods by Space Decomposition and Subspace Correction, SIAM Review 34(4) (1992) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Peter Bastian, Lecture Notes on Parallel Solution of Large Sparse Linear Systems, University of Heidelberg (2015) (standard reference, not scraped)