Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Explicit sectorial remainder bound for the right-half-plane log-Gamma branch

Statement

Fix 0<δ≤π/2 and z∈C with Re⁡z>0. For the branch ℓ+ from Log-Gamma branch on the right half-plane, Binet integral identity for the right-half-plane log-Gamma branch gives ℓ+(z)=(z−12)Log⁡z−z+12log⁡(2π)+R(z),R(z)=∫0∞Φ(u)(u+z)2 du, where Φ(u)=∫0u(⌊v⌋−v+1/2) dv. Then ∣R(z)∣≤18sin⁡2(δ/2)∣z∣. For δ=π/2, the bound is 1/(4∣z∣). The relative error after exponentiating the three main terms is at most exp⁡(∣R(z)∣)−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: 0<δ≤π/2 and Re⁡z>0.

[F1]

Binet integral identity for the right-half-plane log-Gamma branch: the exact branch identity and its remainder representation hold, with Φ(n+t)=t(1−t)/2 on each unit interval.

[F2]

Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus: for z=x+iy, ∣z∣2=x2+y2.

[F3]

Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine and Trigonometric identities, Machin's formula and reduced Taylor tails: cosine decreases on [0,π] and cos⁡(π/2)=0, hence cos⁡δ≥0 for 0<δ≤π/2.

[F4]

Trigonometric identities, Machin's formula and reduced Taylor tails: the cosine addition identity and sin⁡2x+cos⁡2x=1 give sin⁡2(δ/2)=(1−cos⁡δ)/2 and cos⁡2(δ/2)=(1+cos⁡δ)/2.

Proof

1.1F1algebra

The formula in [F1] defines Φ(n+t)=t(1−t)/2 for integer n≥0 and 0≤t≤1. Hence 0≤Φ(u)≤1/8 for every u≥0.

1.2givenF2F3F4algebra

Write z=x+iy, with x=Re⁡z>0, and put r=∣z∣. By [F2], ∣u+z∣2=(u+x)2+y2=u2+r2+2ux≥u2+r2≥u2+r2−2urcos⁡δ, since u≥0 and cos⁡δ≥0 by [F3]. The difference between the last expression and sin⁡2(δ/2)(u+r)2 is cos⁡2(δ/2)(u−r)2≥0 by [F4]. Thus ∣u+z∣−2≤sin⁡−2(δ/2)(u+r)−2.

2.1F1step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

Applying steps 1.1 and 1.2 to the remainder in [F1] gives ∣R(z)∣≤18sin⁡2(δ/2)∫0∞du(u+r)2=18sin⁡2(δ/2)r. For any complex w, ∣ew−1∣≤e∣w∣−1 by the exponential series; apply this with w=R(z).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources