Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Binet integral identity for the right-half-plane log-Gamma branch

Statement

For Re⁡z>0, let ℓ+(z) be the branch in Log-Gamma branch on the right half-plane. Define Φ(u)=∫0u(⌊v⌋−v+1/2) dv. Then the absolutely convergent integral satisfies ℓ+(z)=(z−12)Log⁡z−z+12log⁡(2π)+∫0∞Φ(u)(u+z)2 du. On each unit interval, Φ(n+t)=t(1−t)/2 for 0≤t≤1; hence 0≤Φ(u)≤1/8.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Re⁡z>0 and an integer N≥2 tending to infinity in the proof.

[F1]

Log-Gamma branch on the right half-plane: ℓ+ is defined by −Log⁡z−γEz+∑k=1∞(zk−Log⁡(1+z/k)).

[F2]

Weierstrass log-Gamma series converges to a Gamma branch: the defining series converges locally uniformly on the right half-plane.

[F3]

The Euler-Mascheroni constant and The Euler–Mascheroni constant and the harmonic asymptotic: γE=γ=lim⁡n→∞(Hn−log⁡n).

[F4]

Stirling's formula for factorials: n!∼2πn(n/e)n as n→∞ through positive integers.

[F5]
[F6]

A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion and The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a): continuous functions on compact intervals are integrable, and an integrable derivative integrates to its endpoint difference; the real statement applies to real and imaginary parts of a complex-valued path.

[F8]

The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t: the real logarithm is continuous on (0,∞) and satisfies log⁡′(x)=1/x.

[F9]

The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function and Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm: writing e=exp⁡(1) gives log⁡e=1, and log⁡(xy)=log⁡x+log⁡y for positive x,y.

Proof

1.1givenF7algebra

Define f(u)=⌊u⌋−u+1/2. For u=n+t with integer n≥0 and 0≤t<1, f(u)=1/2−t. Each full unit interval has integral zero, and its partial integral is t(1−t)/2. Therefore Φ(n+t)=t(1−t)/2, Φ(n)=0, and 0≤Φ≤1/8.

2.1F5F6F7step 1.1algebra

On [n,n+1], Φ′=f and [F7] gives ∫nn+1f(u)u+z du=[Φ(u)u+z]nn+1+∫nn+1Φ(u)(u+z)2 du=∫nn+1Φ(u)(u+z)2 du, since Φ(n)=Φ(n+1)=0. Summing over n<N gives IN(z):=∫0Nf(u)u+z du=∫0NΦ(u)(u+z)2 du. Because ∣u+z∣≥u+Re⁡z and Φ≤1/8, the right-hand side converges absolutely as N→∞.

2.2givenF5F6F9step 1.1algebra

On each [n,n+1], write f(u)=n+12−u=(n+z+12)−(u+z). By [F5] the function (n+z+12)Log⁡(u+z)−u has derivative f(u)/(u+z); its derivative is continuous and integrable on the compact interval by [F6]. Applying [F6] and summing the resulting endpoint differences yields IN(z)=(N+z−12)Log⁡(N+z)−(z+12)Log⁡z−N−log⁡((N−1)!)−zHN−1+∑k=1N−1(zk−Log⁡(1+z/k)). The coefficient of each internal Log⁡(k+z) in the endpoint sum is −1. For k≥1, Log⁡(k+z)=log⁡k+Log⁡(1+z/k) because k>0 is real and multiplication by it preserves the principal argument; [F9] gives ∑k=1N−1log⁡k=log⁡((N−1)!). These identities give the displayed form.

3.1F1F2F3step 2.2algebra

Add −Log⁡z−γEz to the finite sum in step 2.2. By [F1]--[F3], the resulting left side converges to ℓ+(z), while ℓ+(z)=IN(z)−(N+z−12)Log⁡(N+z)+(z−12)Log⁡z+N+log⁡((N−1)!)+z(HN−1−γE)+o(1).

4.1F3F4F5F6F8F9step 3.1algebra

Taking logarithms in [F4] is valid by continuity [F8]. The laws [F9] and e=exp⁡(1) give log⁡(n!)=(n+12)log⁡n−n+12log⁡(2π)+o(1). At n=N−1, since log⁡(1−1/N)=−1/N+O(N−2), this becomes log⁡((N−1)!)=(N−12)log⁡N−N+12log⁡(2π)+o(1). The logarithm estimate follows by integrating 1/(1−t) on [0,1/N]; the difference from 1/N is bounded by 1/(N2(1−1/N)). Also [F3] gives HN−1−γE=log⁡N+o(1). Finally, for fixed z and N>2∣z∣, Log⁡(N+z)=log⁡N+z/N+Oz(N−2), since N>0 and 1+z/N,N+z lie in the right half-plane, so Log⁡(N+z)=log⁡N+Log⁡(1+z/N). By [F5] and [F6], Log⁡(1+w)−w=−∫01tw2/(1+tw) dt for w=z/N; here ∣1+tw∣≥1 when Re⁡z>0. Therefore (N+z−12)Log⁡(N+z)=(N+z−12)log⁡N+z+o(1).

5.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1algebra∎

Substitute these asymptotics into step 3.1. The coefficients of log⁡N cancel, and N cancels the −N in the factorial term, leaving ℓ+(z)=lim⁡N→∞IN(z)+(z−12)Log⁡z−z+12log⁡(2π). By step 2.1, the limit is the absolutely convergent integral of Φ(u)/(u+z)2. This is the claimed identity.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

92 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources