Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Signature additivity under gluing

Statement

Let W₀ and W₁ be compact oriented smooth 4-manifolds with a common identified boundary M, and let Γ be a discrete group. Suppose coefficient homomorphisms ψ_i:π₁(W_i)→Γ agree on π₁(M), and let X=W₀∪_M(−W₁) be the resulting closed oriented 4-manifold with its glued coefficient map. Then sign(X)=sign(W₀)−sign(W₁) and sign_Γ^(2)(X)=sign_Γ^(2)(W₀,ψ₀)−sign_Γ^(2)(W₁,ψ₁).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The manifolds, common entire boundary, matching coefficient maps and gluing in the Statement. The full AC convention is the standing convention of the signature definition.

[F1]

Signatures are positive-minus-negative spectral traces of the coefficient intersection forms; orientation reversal negates these forms. For arbitrary discrete targets use the finite-projective signature, which agrees with the countable-image signature by its coset-block construction. Topological finite-projective L2 duality and whole-component boundary gluing Integral half-solutions, Strebel classes, and L²-signatures The signature of a closed oriented manifold of dimension divisible by four

[F2]

Finite cellular reduced homology satisfies weak pair and Mayer–Vietoris exactness, bounded Poincaré–Lefschetz duality, and the cap boundary and intersection identities. The closed middle intersection operator is invertible. Finite cellular L2 duality and weak exactness

[F3]

Dense injective pullback preserves inertia, kernels contribute zero, and restriction to a closed coisotropic submodule of a nondegenerate finite Hilbert-module form preserves signature. Von Neumann inertia, dense congruences, and coisotropic reduction

Proof

Given: The data in the Statement. All homology below is completed reduced coefficient homology in finite Hilbert modules, the Hilbert completions of the algebraic projective reduced parts in [F2]; the natural algebraic-to-Hilbert maps are used only as dense maps. Write H=H2(2)(X).

1.1givenF2constructalgebra

Van Kampen gives the glued homomorphism to Γ from the matching restrictions. Let j:H2(2)(W0)⊕H2(2)(W1)→H be the sum of the inclusion maps, and let V=im⁡j‾. The closed intersection operator J on H is invertible by [F2]. Under Poincaré duality, the annihilator V⊥J identifies with the kernel of restriction H(2)2(X)→H(2)2(W0)⊕H(2)2(W1): evaluation on each piece is exactly the pairing with its inclusion in X.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

Weak cohomology Mayer–Vietoris exactness identifies that kernel with the closure of the image of the connecting map H(2)1(M)→H(2)2(X). Cap boundary naturality in [F2] identifies this connecting map, up to its harmless orientation sign, with H2(2)(M)→H2(2)(X) after cap duality on M and X. Cap duality is a bounded isomorphism, so it preserves these closures. Hence V⊥J is the closure of this last image. The inclusion M→X factors through either piece, so this image lies in V. Thus V is coisotropic.

2.2F1F2step 1.1algebra

The pullback form j∗Jj is the orthogonal sum of the intersection forms on W0 and −W1. Indeed the same-piece term is the absolute-to-relative intersection pairing by cap naturality; cross terms vanish because representative cellular chains can be pushed into the respective collar interiors, which are disjoint. This can be checked on the finite dual cellular chains before completion: each intersection contribution comes from a cell and its dual in the same piece, with its given group-ring coefficient, and there are no cross-piece intersections. The identity extends by boundedness to the reduced homology in [F2]. Reversing orientation on W1 negates its form.

3.1F3step 2.1step 2.2algebra

Discard ker⁡j; it is a null summand of the pullback form. The restriction of j to its Hilbert orthogonal complement is injective with dense image in V. By [F3] its pullback has the signature of the restricted form on V. By the coisotropic conclusion of step 2.1, this is the signature of J on H. Step 2.2 and additivity of spectral trace on an orthogonal sum give the asserted L2 signature equality.

4.1F1F3step 3.1algebra∎

Apply the same argument to the trivial coefficient group. Reduced homology is ordinary finite-dimensional complex homology; its form is the complexification of the real intersection form. Complexification preserves both real inertia dimensions, as in [F3]. The resulting equality is the asserted ordinary signature equality.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources