How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Signature additivity under gluing
Statement
Let W₀ and W₁ be compact oriented smooth 4-manifolds with a common identified boundary M, and let Γ be a discrete group. Suppose coefficient homomorphisms ψ_i:π₁(W_i)→Γ agree on π₁(M), and let X=W₀∪_M(−W₁) be the resulting closed oriented 4-manifold with its glued coefficient map. Then sign(X)=sign(W₀)−sign(W₁) and sign_Γ^(2)(X)=sign_Γ^(2)(W₀,ψ₀)−sign_Γ^(2)(W₁,ψ₁).
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The manifolds, common entire boundary, matching coefficient maps and gluing in the Statement. The full AC convention is the standing convention of the signature definition.
Signatures are positive-minus-negative spectral traces of the coefficient intersection forms; orientation reversal negates these forms. For arbitrary discrete targets use the finite-projective signature, which agrees with the countable-image signature by its coset-block construction. Topological finite-projective L2 duality and whole-component boundary gluing Integral half-solutions, Strebel classes, and L²-signatures The signature of a closed oriented manifold of dimension divisible by four
Finite cellular reduced homology satisfies weak pair and Mayer–Vietoris exactness, bounded Poincaré–Lefschetz duality, and the cap boundary and intersection identities. The closed middle intersection operator is invertible. Finite cellular L2 duality and weak exactness
Dense injective pullback preserves inertia, kernels contribute zero, and restriction to a closed coisotropic submodule of a nondegenerate finite Hilbert-module form preserves signature. Von Neumann inertia, dense congruences, and coisotropic reduction
Proof
Given: The data in the Statement. All homology below is completed reduced coefficient homology in finite Hilbert modules, the Hilbert completions of the algebraic projective reduced parts in [F2]; the natural algebraic-to-Hilbert maps are used only as dense maps. Write .
Van Kampen gives the glued homomorphism to from the matching restrictions. Let be the sum of the inclusion maps, and let . The closed intersection operator on is invertible by [F2]. Under Poincaré duality, the annihilator identifies with the kernel of restriction : evaluation on each piece is exactly the pairing with its inclusion in .
Weak cohomology Mayer–Vietoris exactness identifies that kernel with the closure of the image of the connecting map . Cap boundary naturality in [F2] identifies this connecting map, up to its harmless orientation sign, with after cap duality on and . Cap duality is a bounded isomorphism, so it preserves these closures. Hence is the closure of this last image. The inclusion factors through either piece, so this image lies in . Thus is coisotropic.
The pullback form is the orthogonal sum of the intersection forms on and . Indeed the same-piece term is the absolute-to-relative intersection pairing by cap naturality; cross terms vanish because representative cellular chains can be pushed into the respective collar interiors, which are disjoint. This can be checked on the finite dual cellular chains before completion: each intersection contribution comes from a cell and its dual in the same piece, with its given group-ring coefficient, and there are no cross-piece intersections. The identity extends by boundedness to the reduced homology in [F2]. Reversing orientation on negates its form.
Discard ; it is a null summand of the pullback form. The restriction of to its Hilbert orthogonal complement is injective with dense image in . By [F3] its pullback has the signature of the restricted form on . By the coisotropic conclusion of step 2.1, this is the signature of on . Step 2.2 and additivity of spectral trace on an orthogonal sum give the asserted signature equality.
Apply the same argument to the trivial coefficient group. Reduced homology is ordinary finite-dimensional complex homology; its form is the complexification of the real intersection form. Complexification preserves both real inertia dimensions, as in [F3]. The resulting equality is the asserted ordinary signature equality.
Depends on
- Integral half-solutions, Strebel classes, and L²-signatures
- The signature of a closed oriented manifold of dimension divisible by four
- Finite cellular L2 duality and weak exactness
- Von Neumann inertia, dense congruences, and coisotropic reduction
- Topological finite-projective L2 duality and whole-component boundary gluing
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Wolfgang Lück and Thomas Schick, "Various L²-signatures and a topological L²-signature theorem" (standard reference, not scraped)
- Tim D. Cochran, Kent E. Orr, and Peter Teichner, "Knot concordance, Whitney towers and L²-signatures" (standard reference, not scraped)