Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Von Neumann inertia, dense congruences, and coisotropic reduction

Statement

Work under the standing AC convention for finite von Neumann modules. Let A=NG with its finite trace, and let all Hilbert modules below be ranges of projections on finite sums of ℓ2(G). For a bounded self-adjoint module operator J define its positive and negative inertia by the traces of 1(0,∞)(J) and 1(−∞,0)(J), and its signature by their difference. Each inertia is the supremum of dimensions of closed module subspaces on which the form ⟨Jx,x⟩ is strictly positive or strictly negative, respectively. If T:H0→H1 is bounded, injective and has dense image, then T∗JT and J have the same inertia. If J is invertible, V⊆H is closed, and V⊥J⊆V, then the form on H and its restriction to V have equal signatures. Kernels contribute zero. These statements include ordinary real signatures by complexification and the trivial-group trace.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite projection modules, their bounded module maps and self-adjoint forms in the Statement.

[F1]

Matrix spectral projections, polar rank-nullity, trace faithfulness and normality, and Hilbert-closed submodule projections have the properties proved in the finite-module lemma. Finite von Neumann modules, Hilbert closures, and dimension-zero quotients

Proof

Given: The data in the Statement.

1.1F1givenalgebra

The positive spectral subspace of J is strictly positive for its quadratic form: integrating the positive spectral variable gives a positive number for every nonzero vector there. If a closed module subspace U is strictly positive, its projection into that positive spectral subspace is injective, because a vector with no positive spectral part has nonpositive quadratic form. Polar rank-nullity in [F1] therefore bounds dim⁡AU by the trace of the positive spectral projection. This proves the positive characterization, and applying it to −J proves the negative one.

2.1F1step 1.1constructalgebra

For two projections p,q on a common finite module, rank-nullity for (I−q):pH→(I−q)H gives τ(p∧q)≥τ(p)−τ(I−q); its kernel is exactly their closed range intersection. If T is injective with dense image, let qε=1[ε,∞)(TT∗). The traces τ(qε) tend to dim⁡AH1 by [F1], and qεH1 lies in the image of T with a bounded module inverse on it. Intersect this range with a positive spectral subspace pδH1=1[δ,∞)(J)H1. Its trace tends to τ(pδ) as ε↓0 by the intersection inequality. Pulling it back by the bounded inverse of T gives a closed positive subspace for T∗JT of the same dimension. Step 1.1 and then δ↓0 show that the positive inertia of T∗JT is at least that of J. Conversely, on every closed positive subspace for T∗JT, project T into the positive spectral subspace of J; this map is injective, giving the reverse inequality by [F1]. Repeat with −J.

3.1F1step 2.1constructalgebra

Assume J is invertible and put L=V⊥J⊆V, K=V∩L⊥ and Q=V⊥, where unmarked orthogonals use the underlying Hilbert product. These are closed module subspaces and H=L⊕K⊕Q. The identity L=J−1Q says that J∣L:L→Q is a bounded isomorphism. In this decomposition the matrix of J is (00B0CEB∗E∗F), where B∗:L→Q is invertible. Replace k∈K by k−(B∗)−1E∗k. This bounded invertible triangular change makes K orthogonal, for the form, to both L and Q, leaving its form C unchanged. In the remaining L⊕Q block, replace l by l−12(B∗)−1Fq to obtain (0BB∗0). Conjugation by diag⁡(IL,−IQ) negates this last form; its positive and negative spectral projections consequently have the same trace, so its signature is zero. Step 2.1 applies to the bounded invertible changes just used, proving that the original signature is the signature of C.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

The restriction of the form to V=L⊕K is 0⊕C, so it too has signature equal to that of C. This proves coisotropic reduction. For a map with a kernel, its pullback form vanishes on that kernel and has no cross terms with it; discard the kernel and use step 2.1 on its orthogonal complement whenever the remaining image is dense. For the trivial group, projection traces are ordinary complex dimensions; complexifying a real symmetric form preserves its real positive and negative dimensions by diagonalizing the finite real form. Thus the ordinary case is included.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources