Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Topological five-dimensional bordisms preserve ordinary and L2 signatures

Statement

Assume AC. Let Y be a compact oriented Hausdorff topological five-manifold with supplied boundary collar, and let X=∂Y have its boundary orientation. Supply a based homomorphism ψ:π1Y→G on each component, where G is an arbitrary discrete group, with the standard unitary regular coefficient systems. Then sign⁡G(2)(X,ψ∣X)=0,sign⁡(X)=0. In particular, when X=X1⊔(−X0), the ordinary and L2 signatures of these closed oriented four-manifolds agree across this actual coefficient-extending TOP bordism. The equality is unchanged under embedding the target group in a larger group. This theorem asserts bordism invariance and does not assert existence of a bordism between arbitrary closed coefficient manifolds.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the actual collared oriented Y, its boundary X, and the compatible regular coefficient maps in the Statement.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is the standing spectral and projective-comparison hypothesis of the finite-projective supplier.

[F1]

For compact collared TOP manifolds in every dimension, bounded finite-projective coefficient chain models and their pair diagrams transfer actual cap duality to bounded isomorphisms on completed reduced homology and cohomology. Pair sequences are weakly exact; algebraic harmonic parts are dense. Cap-boundary and restriction identities hold after completion. For a closed oriented four-manifold its middle Hermitian operator is boundedly invertible. Model independence and coefficient-subgroup induction hold by finite matrices and identical coset operator blocks. Topological finite-projective L2 duality and whole-component boundary gluing

[F2]

Restriction of a boundedly invertible Hermitian form on a finite Hilbert von Neumann module to a closed coisotropic submodule preserves its signature; a zero form has zero signature. Von Neumann inertia, dense congruences, and coisotropic reduction

Proof

1.1A1F1givenconstruct

Use [F1] for Y,X and (Y,X) with R=CG and A=NG. Write V=H2(X) for completed reduced cohomology. Transport the middle intersection form of X to V by its bounded cap isomorphism, and denote it by Q. It is a bounded Hermitian form with boundedly invertible operator, since X is closed. Let r:H2(Y)→V be restriction and δ:V→H3(Y,X) the completed connecting map of the pair. These are bounded maps of finite Hilbert A modules. Set U=im⁡r‾, an actual closed submodule; no assertion that im⁡r is closed is made.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Cap duality on Y and Riesz duality give a bounded nondegenerate scalar sesquilinear pairing H2(Y)×H3(Y,X)→C: take evaluation of the first class on the cap of the second with [Y,X], followed by the canonical trace, initially on algebraic harmonic parts. Riesz and the bounded cap isomorphism extend this pairing to the Hilbert completions and identify either factor boundedly with the Hilbert dual of the other. No A-valued pairing is asserted on arbitrary ℓ2 vectors. The boundary identity identifies Q(ra,b) with this pairing of a and δb, up to the fixed conjugation convention, for all a∈H2(Y) and b∈V. Concretely, for an actual degree-two boundary cocycle β extend it to a cochain β~ on Y. The relative cocycle dβ~ represents δβ, and the cohomology-first cap formula gives ∂(β~∩[Y,X])=β∩[X]−(dβ~)∩[Y,X]. Thus i∗PDXβ=PDY,Xδβ in absolute homology. Pairing with a proves the asserted identity on algebraic harmonic parts. Such parts are dense, all displayed maps and pairings are bounded, and [F1] transfers this actual identity to the completed modules. This uses cochains and the finite orientation chain, with no geometric transverse intersections in dimension four or five.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

By step 2.1 and nondegeneracy of the perfect pairing, Q(ra,b)=0 for every a if and only if δb=0. Continuity replaces im⁡r by its closure without changing this annihilator, giving U⊥Q=ker⁡δ. Weak exactness of the actual pair sequence in [F1] gives ker⁡δ=im⁡r‾=U. Therefore U is a closed self-annihilating, hence coisotropic, submodule, and Q∣U is identically zero. These are equalities of Hilbert-closed submodules; no algebraic exactness has been promoted to closed-range exactness.

4.1F1F2step 1.1step 3.1algebra

Apply [F2] to the invertible closed-boundary form Q and U. Its signature is the signature of the zero restriction, namely zero. The bounded cap change of coordinates preserves inertia, so this is precisely sign⁡G(2)(X). Apply the same argument to the trivial group: its complex Hermitian intersection form is the complexification of the real symmetric form, with equal positive and negative multiplicities, and hence gives the ordinary signature zero. All arguments allow finite disconnected boundaries and empty boundary; in the latter case the middle module is zero.

5.1F1step 4.1algebra∎

A disjoint union is an orthogonal direct sum of the finite-projective complexes and forms; orientation reversal negates cap and the form. Thus X=X1⊔(−X0) in step 4.1 yields the two asserted bordism-invariance equalities. For an embedded coefficient subgroup G↪K, construct the same finite models over CG and extend the matrices to CK. Every left-G matrix decomposes on ℓ2(K)=⨁Gγℓ2(Gγ) into identical copies of its ℓ2(G) operator. Kernel, harmonic and positive/negative projections have the same identity-coordinate diagonal trace. By [F1] this preserves the signatures on both ends and on X, for arbitrary cardinalities of K. No equality between ordinary and L2 signatures on arbitrary closed four-manifolds and no TOP bordism realization theorem was assumed.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources