Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Localized Blanchfield pairings and higher-order rho-invariants

Definition

Let M be a closed oriented three-manifold with a specified coefficient homomorphism ϕ:π1(Mj)→Γ on each component, where Γ is PTFA. The integral coefficient ring is Λ=Z[Γ] with its fraction division ring KΓ. More generally let k be Z or a commutative field, let K be the fraction division ring of k[Γ], and let k[Γ]⊆R⊆K be an involution-stable unital intermediate ring. The involution fixes k and sends g to g−1; on fractions it is the involutive anti-automorphism extending this formula. Taking k=Z and R=Λ recovers the integral convention.

If H1(M;K)=0, the coefficient Bockstein, oriented Poincaré duality and evaluation define the Blanchfield linking pairing BM,ϕ,R:TH1(M;R)×TH1(M;R)⟶K/R. Here T denotes the submodule of elements with a nonzero right annihilator, the first variable is conjugate-linear, and the second is right-linear. Nonsingularity means that the adjoint TH1(M;R)‾⟶Hom⁡R(TH1(M;R),K/R) is an isomorphism of left R-modules, where r⋅xˉ=xrˉ‾ on the conjugate module. This is equivalent to the conjugate-dual formulation in the right-module convention. For Γ=Z with generator t, R=Z[t±1] and K=Q(t) give the classical coefficient convention. Nonsingularity is a separate property of the defined pairing, with its coefficient hypotheses supplied by the nonsingularity theorem.

For a homomorphism φ:π₁(M)→G and an extension ψ:π₁(W)→G over a compact oriented 4-manifold W with ∂W=M, define the signature defect by ρ(M,φ;W,ψ)=sign_G^(2)(W,ψ)−sign(W). It is an invariant of (M,φ) only when a separate bordism-independence theorem applies.

Coefficient-group convention

In the signature-defect clause, coefficient groups are regarded as discrete, with the standing full AC convention of the signature definition. For an arbitrary target group use the finite-projective signature of Topological finite-projective L2 duality and whole-component boundary gluing. Its proof 13.1 identifies this signature with that of the countable coefficient image, so it agrees with the countable-group convention in Integral half-solutions, Strebel classes, and L²-signatures. This supplies the signature used in the displayed defect without asserting bordism independence.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources