How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Localized Blanchfield pairings and higher-order rho-invariants
Definition
Let be a closed oriented three-manifold with a specified coefficient homomorphism on each component, where is PTFA. The integral coefficient ring is with its fraction division ring . More generally let be or a commutative field, let be the fraction division ring of , and let be an involution-stable unital intermediate ring. The involution fixes and sends to ; on fractions it is the involutive anti-automorphism extending this formula. Taking and recovers the integral convention.
If , the coefficient Bockstein, oriented Poincaré duality and evaluation define the Blanchfield linking pairing Here denotes the submodule of elements with a nonzero right annihilator, the first variable is conjugate-linear, and the second is right-linear. Nonsingularity means that the adjoint is an isomorphism of left -modules, where on the conjugate module. This is equivalent to the conjugate-dual formulation in the right-module convention. For with generator , and give the classical coefficient convention. Nonsingularity is a separate property of the defined pairing, with its coefficient hypotheses supplied by the nonsingularity theorem.
For a homomorphism φ:π₁(M)→G and an extension ψ:π₁(W)→G over a compact oriented 4-manifold W with ∂W=M, define the signature defect by ρ(M,φ;W,ψ)=sign_G^(2)(W,ψ)−sign(W). It is an invariant of (M,φ) only when a separate bordism-independence theorem applies.
Definition references
Coefficient-group convention
In the signature-defect clause, coefficient groups are regarded as discrete, with the standing full AC convention of the signature definition. For an arbitrary target group use the finite-projective signature of Topological finite-projective L2 duality and whole-component boundary gluing. Its proof 13.1 identifies this signature with that of the countable coefficient image, so it agrees with the countable-group convention in Integral half-solutions, Strebel classes, and L²-signatures. This supplies the signature used in the displayed defect without asserting bordism independence.
Depends on
- Integral half-solutions, Strebel classes, and L²-signatures
- Topological finite-projective L2 duality and whole-component boundary gluing
- The maximal-abelian-cover Alexander module of an oriented link
- Poly-torsion-free abelian groups
- PTFA group rings embed in skew fields of fractions
- Integral and field PTFA group rings have compatible Ore fractions and involutions
Used by
- Classical and localized PTFA Blanchfield nonsingularity criteria Lemma
- Higher-order rho bounds and coprime separation Lemma
- Integral-pair persistence and Blanchfield bordism for iterated infection Lemma
- Canonical finite cyclic knot signature defects equal Seifert signature averages Theorem
- Infinite rank for iterated winding-zero satellites Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tim D. Cochran, Kent E. Orr, and Peter Teichner, “Knot concordance, Whitney towers and L²-signatures” (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jae Choon Cha, “Amenable L²-Theoretic Methods and Knot Concordance” (standard reference, not scraped)