Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Integral and field PTFA group rings have compatible Ore fractions and involutions

Statement

Let Γ be PTFA and let k be either Z or a commutative field. The group ring A=k[Γ] has no zero divisors, satisfies both Ore conditions, and has a fraction division ring K in which every element is both a right and a left fraction of elements of A. The involution ∑cgg‾=∑cgg−1 extends uniquely to an involutive anti-automorphism of K.

Every intermediate unital ring A⊆R⊆K has no zero divisors, satisfies both Ore conditions, and has this same K as its fraction division ring. If R is stable under the extended involution, that involution restricts to R and descends to its additive quotient K/R. None of these assertions requires a choice principle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The coefficient ring, PTFA series and indicated intermediate ring when used.

[F1]

Nonsplit extensions by torsion-free abelian quotients preserve absence of group-ring zero divisors over every commutative field. Nonsplit torsion-free abelian extensions preserve absence of group-ring zero divisors

[F2]

PTFA groups have finite left Folner sets, and a group ring without zero divisors over a commutative field with these sets satisfies both Ore conditions and has a constructed right-fraction division ring. PTFA groups satisfy the finite Folner condition without a choice hypothesis, Finite Folner sets give both Ore conditions and a constructed skew field of fractions

Proof

1.1F1F2givenconstructalgebra

If k is a commutative field, apply [F1] finitely many times along the supplied subnormal PTFA series, starting with k[{1}]=k. Only normality of one subgroup in the next is needed. This gives absence of zero divisors in A. By [F2], A satisfies both Ore conditions and embeds in a division ring K whose elements are right fractions. Each right fraction as−1 is also a left fraction: for a≠0, the left Ore condition gives ta=bs≠0, hence as−1=t−1b; zero uses denominator one.

2.1step 1.1constructalgebra

For k=Z, embed A coefficientwise into Q[Γ] and use its division ring from step 1.1. The embedding is injective by the unique group basis, so A has no zero divisors. A nonzero common right multiple of integral group-ring elements obtained over Q[Γ] has rational multiplier coefficients in two finite supports. Multiply both multipliers by a common positive integer clearing those finitely many denominators; this integer is central and nonzero, so the equality becomes a nonzero common right multiple over A. The same operation clears the left multipliers, proving both Ore conditions for A. A fraction as−1 over Q[Γ] becomes (Na)(Ns)−1 over A for one common central positive integer N. Left fractions are cleared identically. Thus this same K is the stated fraction division ring of Z[Γ].

3.1step 1.1step 2.1constructalgebra

On A the displayed coefficient formula is additive, reverses products and has square the identity, directly from the group law and commutativity of k. Define on a right fraction ȷ(as−1)=sˉ−1aˉ. To check independence, if as−1=bt−1 choose su=tv=w≠0 in A; multiplication on the right by w gives au=bv. Applying the original involution gives uˉaˉ=vˉbˉ, while wˉ=uˉsˉ=vˉtˉ. Multiplying on the left by wˉ−1 proves sˉ−1aˉ=tˉ−1bˉ. Thus the formula is well-defined.

4.1step 3.1constructalgebra

With the same common denominator, the sum is (au+bv)w−1, and wˉ−1(uˉaˉ+vˉbˉ)=sˉ−1aˉ+tˉ−1bˉ, proving additivity. For a product (as−1)(bt−1) with b≠0, choose bu=sv≠0. It is av(tu)−1. Its image is tˉ−1uˉ−1vˉaˉ, which equals tˉ−1bˉsˉ−1aˉ because uˉbˉ=vˉsˉ. This is the reverse product of the two images. Zero factors are immediate. The map preserves one and sends nonzero elements to nonzero elements, so it preserves inverses in reverse multiplication. Its square fixes A and therefore every fraction, proving it is an involutive anti-automorphism. Every anti-automorphism extending the one on A must have this fraction formula, proving uniqueness.

5.1step 1.1step 2.1step 4.1constructalgebra

Let A⊆R⊆K. It has no zero divisors since K is a division ring. For nonzero a,b∈R, express a−1b=cd−1 over A; then bd=ac≠0 is a common right multiple with multipliers in R. Express ba−1=u−1v over A; then ub=va≠0 is a common left multiple. All elements of K are already fractions over A, so are fractions over R. If R is involution-stable, step 4.1 and the equality ȷ2=1 give ȷ(R)=R; hence q+R↦ȷ(q)+R is well-defined on the additive quotient and has square one.

6.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1algebra∎

Each field-extension step uses the finite supplied series, each multiplier or denominator clearing uses two finite supports, and each fraction calculation chooses a single finite common multiple. No order, section or system of representatives on an infinite set was chosen. This proves the stated choice scope for the group ring, its involution and every intermediate ring.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources