Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The boundary kernel of a rational homology ball is a linking metabolizer

Statement

Assume AC. Let W be a compact connected smooth oriented 4-manifold with rational homology of a point and connected boundary Y. Then Y is a rational homology sphere, and P=ker⁡(H1(Y;Z)→H1(W;Z)) is a metabolizer for the torsion linking form λY.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, a compact connected oriented rational homology 4-ball W, and its connected boundary Y.

[A1]

Full AC is assumed wherever the cover and orientation conventions use the choice axiom. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

Poincaré–Lefschetz duality identifies Hi(W,Y;Z) with H4−i(W;Z) and carries the relative fundamental class to the boundary fundamental class. Poincaré–Lefschetz duality

[F2]

The integral homology-pair sequence is exact. Long exact sequence of a pair

[F3]

The cohomology universal coefficient sequence over Z is 0→Ext⁡(Hj−1(W),Z)→Hj(W;Z)→Hom⁡(Hj(W),Z)→0. The universal coefficient theorem for cohomology over a PID

[F4]

The finite-CW supplier assumes countable choice as defined by [def-countable-choice]; under [A1], full AC implies it by applying the choice function to the indexed family. Compact smooth manifolds have finite CW models under countable choice The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) The Axiom of Choice

[F5]

The linking form on a closed oriented rational homology sphere is perfect and its bounding-chain expression is the Bockstein–duality evaluation. The torsion linking pairing of a rational homology sphere is nonsingular Bounding-chain expression for a torsion linking pairing

[F6]

In a finite nonsingular linking form, a subgroup P is a metabolizer when P=P⊥. Finite nonsingular linking forms and metabolizers

[F7]

Poincaré duality on Y identifies H2(Y;Z) with H1(Y;Z); Poincaré–Lefschetz duality and the cap-product boundary identity identify the homology boundary map H2(W,Y)→H1(Y) with cohomology restriction H2(W)→H2(Y) under these dualities. Poincaré duality for oriented topological manifolds Poincaré–Lefschetz duality Cap product boundary identity

[F8]

The coefficient sequence 0→Z→Q→Q/Z→0 gives the natural long exact cohomology sequence and its Bockstein map. The long exact sequence in cohomology

Proof

1.1F1F4givenconstructA1

The rational homology-pair sequence and [F1], with Hi(W;Q)=0 for i>0, give H1(Y;Q)=H2(Y;Q)=0; connectedness gives H0(Y;Q)=Q, and orientation gives H3(Y;Q)=Q. Thus Y is a rational homology sphere. By [F4] and [A1], both W and its smooth boundary Y have finite CW type, so their integral homology groups are finitely generated. The groups H1(Y;Z), H1(W;Z) and H2(W;Z) have vanishing rationalizations and are therefore finite.

2.1F1F2F3F7step 1.1

Put A=H1(Y;Z), B=H1(W;Z), and C=H2(W;Z). Since A is finite by step 1.1, the universal coefficient sequence [F3] gives H1(Y;Z)=0; [F7] then gives H2(Y;Z)=0. Also H3(W;Z)=0: [F1] identifies H4(W,Y) with H0(W)=Z, and its fundamental-class boundary maps to the generator of H3(Y)=Z; since H3(W,Y)≅H1(W)=0, exactness forces H3(W)=0.

3.1F1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1algebraA1

By [F3], H2(W;Z)≅Ext⁡(B,Z) and H3(W;Z)≅Ext⁡(C,Z), because B,C are finite and H3(W)=0. Their orders are ∣B∣ and ∣C∣. Under [F1], these are the orders of H2(W,Y) and H1(W,Y), respectively. The pair sequence [F2] shows that P=ker⁡(A→B) is the cokernel of the injective map H2(W)→H2(W,Y), while B→H1(W,Y) is onto because the next map H0(Y)→H0(W) is an isomorphism. Hence ∣P∣=∣B∣/∣C∣ and ∣A/P∣=∣B∣/∣C∣, so ∣A∣=∣P∣2.

3.2F1F2F5F7F8step 1.1step 2.1algebraA1

To prove isotropy, [F2] and the naturality in [F7] identify P under Poincaré duality with the image of H2(W;Z)→H2(Y;Z). For x,y∈P, choose lifts x~,y~∈H2(W;Z). Since W is a rational homology ball, the coefficient Bockstein H1(W;Q/Z)→H2(W;Z) is onto by [F8]: the adjacent groups H1(W;Q) and H2(W;Q) vanish. Choose γ∈H1(W;Q/Z) with Bockstein y~. The Bockstein–duality formula in [F5] evaluates λY(y,x) as the restriction of γ⌣x~ on [Y]; symmetry of λY then gives the same value for λY(x,y). This cup class extends over W, and the inclusion sends [Y] to zero in H3(W) because Y=∂W. Thus λY(x,y)=0.

4.1F5F6step 3.1step 3.2algebra∎

The isotropy from step 3.2 gives P⊆P⊥. Nonsingularity [F5] implies ∣P⊥∣=∣A∣/∣P∣=∣P∣ by step 3.1. Therefore P=P⊥, so P is a metabolizer by [F6].

Unresolved proof obligations

The finite-CW step is supplied by [F4], and the boundary naturality and Bockstein steps are supplied by [F7] and [F8].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources