How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Simplex integrals are independent of affine coordinate identification
Statement
The integral of a smooth -form over a smooth singular -simplex is unchanged when its affine span is identified with by any orientation-preserving affine coordinates. It is also independent of the neighbourhood extension used to form the pullback.
Facts & Assumptions
Integral of a form over a smooth singular simplex defines integration after choosing a smooth neighbourhood extension and supplies compact Jordan integrability in the standard affine coordinates.
An injective map with invertible derivative sends compact Jordan sets to compact Jordan sets applies to any invertible affine map on , for .
Change of variables for an injective map on a compact Jordan set gives the integral transformation with the absolute Jacobian determinant.
The pullback of a differential form defines pullback by evaluating the form on the images of the input tangent vectors.
Proof
Given: A simplex , a form and two positive affine parametrizations . Put and .
Suppose . Each of is an invertible affine image of the standard compact Jordan simplex from [F1], hence compact Jordan by [F2]. Put . It is an affine diffeomorphism of , it maps onto , and its constant derivative has determinant because both parametrizations are positive.
For a single smooth extension write . The coefficient is smooth near and bounded on . By [F4], its expression in the parametrization is : evaluating the alternating form on the columns of gives exactly this determinant. Thus the coefficient in coordinates is .
Apply [F3] to the open set , injective map , compact Jordan set and continuous function on . Every derivative is invertible and . Therefore which is precisely equality of the two form integrals for a fixed extension. If two neighbourhood extensions are used, they agree on the relative interior of the affine simplex. Their pullback coefficients therefore agree there; every boundary point is a limit of relative-interior points, so continuity makes the coefficients agree on the whole compact simplex. Their integrals consequently coincide in either coordinate system.
For both parametrizations of the affine point are the unique point map and both definitions are evaluation at ; no positive-dimensional change-of-variables theorem is used. For , step 3.1 includes all positive affine rescalings of the closed interval, with endpoints included in the compact set. Zero coefficients and rank-deficient simplex maps require no division by a form value, so the equality still holds. Empty targets supply no simplex. All maps and their coefficients are determined by the two given parametrizations; no choice is used.
Depends on
Used by
- Integration over the signed shuffle equals the product of simplex integrals Lemma
- Stokes theorem for smooth singular chains Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Integral of a form over a smooth singular simplex.
Dependency tree · two levels
30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter S. Park, Proof of de Rham's Theorem (standard reference, not scraped)