Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The strict simplicial algebra adjunctions underlying the cotangent construction

Statement

Let A→B be a morphism of simplicial commutative unital rings (Simplicial objects, simplicial commutative rings and homotopy groups). Write sAlgA/B for the category of simplicial A-algebras C equipped with an augmentation C→B, sAugAlgB for the category of diagrams B→D→B of simplicial rings with composite the identity, sNUAlgB for the category of simplicial B-modules with an associative, commutative, B-bilinear multiplication for which no unit is required, and sModB for simplicial B-modules. There are adjunctions:

  1. C↦B⊗AC from sAlgA/B to sAugAlgB, left adjoint to restriction of scalars;
  2. K(I)=B⊕I with (b,x)(c,y)=(bc,by+cx+xy), from sNUAlgB to sAugAlgB, left adjoint to I(D)=ker⁡(D→B);
  3. Q(I)=I/(submodule generated by all products xy) from sNUAlgB to sModB, left adjoint to Z(M), the zero-multiplication nonunital algebra on M.

Adjunction 2 is an equivalence of ordinary categories, with canonical natural isomorphisms KI(D)→D, (b,x)↦s(b)+x, and IK(I)=I, where s ⁣:B→D is the structure section. It preserves and reflects weak equivalences defined by homology of the associated underlying simplicial abelian groups. If model structures whose fibrations and weak equivalences are created in the underlying simplicial sets have been established separately on these categories, then all three adjunctions are Quillen adjunctions and adjunction 2 is a Quillen equivalence. This conditional assertion does not assert that those model structures exist. No AC is needed for these strict constructions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A morphism A→B of simplicial commutative unital rings; the four categories of the Statement with their degreewise operations.

[F1]

Simplicial commutative rings, simplicial modules over them, and morphisms of simplicial rings (natural transformations) are defined degreewise; weak equivalences of simplicial modules are maps inducing isomorphisms on all homotopy groups πn, computed as homology of the Moore complex (Simplicial objects, simplicial commutative rings and homotopy groups, Homology object of a chain complex).

[F2]

An adjunction between categories may be specified by a natural bijection on hom sets, inverse to the unit and counit descriptions (The unit-counit, hom-set, unit-universal, and counit-universal encodings of an adjunction are equivalent).

[F3]

A Quillen adjunction is an adjunction whose right adjoint preserves fibrations and trivial fibrations, equivalently whose left adjoint preserves cofibrations and trivial cofibrations; a Quillen equivalence additionally requires the weak-equivalence matching condition. The definitions assert no existence of model structures (Model categories and Quillen adjunctions).

Proof

1.1F1F2

Everything is degreewise and simplicial. All four constructions and the maps between them are performed degreewise and the face and degeneracy maps are induced by those of A,B,C,I,M; the induced maps preserve addition, scalar action, multiplication and the identity where required, so each construction lands in the category named and the constructions are natural in degree. Every category appearing is locally small: morphisms are compatible degreewise functions between fixed sets. Hence it suffices by [F2] to exhibit natural hom-set bijections for each adjunction.

1.2F1F2

Adjunction 1. An augmented B-algebra map θ ⁣:B⊗AC→D restricts to an augmented A-algebra map f=θ∘(1⊗−) ⁣:C→D, and conversely f determines the unique B-algebra map b⊗c↦b⋅f(c); the balanced tensor relation is respected because f is A-linear, and multiplicativity, unit and augmentation compatibility hold for θ exactly when they hold for f. The two prescriptions are inverse natural bijections.

1.3F1F2

Adjunction 2. For an augmented B-algebra D with section s ⁣:B→D and augmentation π ⁣:D→B, the kernel I(D) is a B-module through s and is closed under multiplication; every d∈D has the unique expression d=s(π(d))+(d−s(π(d))) with the second summand in I(D), so the displayed map B⊕I(D)→D, (b,x)↦s(b)+x, is a bijective B-module map in each degree and is compatible with the simplicial operators. Multiplying two expressions uses s(b)s(c)=s(bc) and s(b)y=by to compute (bc, by+cx+xy), so the formula makes B⊕I(D) a unital commutative B-algebra and the bijection an isomorphism of augmented B-algebras; the construction is natural in D. Conversely, a nonunital B-algebra map φ ⁣:I→I(D) extends uniquely by (b,x)↦s(b)+φ(x) to an augmented B-algebra map K(I)→D, and restriction to I inverts this, giving the natural bijection and the equality IK(I)=I.

1.4F1F2

Adjunction 3. The B-submodule generated by all products xy is a simplicial submodule of I, because every simplicial operator preserves the multiplication and the B-action. A B-linear map φ ⁣:I→M is multiplicative into the zero-multiplication algebra Z(M) exactly when it annihilates every product xy, and that happens exactly when φ factors uniquely through the quotient Q(I)=I/(xy). These factorizations are inverse natural hom-set bijections, so Q is left adjoint to Z.

2.1F1step 1.3

Weak equivalences. A morphism of augmented B-algebras restricts to a morphism of the kernels, and the isomorphism of step 1.3 decomposes the underlying simplicial abelian group of an augmented algebra as the direct sum s(B)⊕I of simplicial abelian groups. The associated Moore complex of a direct sum is the direct sum of the Moore complexes, and its map is the identity on the B summand and the induced map on I; therefore π∗(B⊕I)≅π∗B⊕π∗I compatibly, so the functor I and its two-sided inverse K preserve and reflect weak equivalences as defined in [F1].

3.1F3step 2.1

Conditional Quillen clause. Assume now that model structures on the four categories exist with fibrations and weak equivalences created in the underlying simplicial sets, and give each category that model structure. The right adjoints of 1 and 3 leave the underlying simplicial-set map unchanged in each degree, hence preserve fibrations and trivial fibrations, and so give Quillen adjunctions by [F3]. For 2, the underlying simplicial set of K(I)=B⊕I is B×I; a lifting problem for K(I)→D relative to a fibration of augmented algebras projects to a lifting problem for I→ker⁡D with the zero simplex in the B-coordinate, and conversely a lifting problem for I extends by the zero simplex in the B-coordinate, so I preserves and reflects fibrations and trivial fibrations; step 2.1 gives the corresponding preservation and reflection of weak equivalences. Hence 2 is a Quillen equivalence, and each of the three adjunctions is a Quillen adjunction, under the stated existence hypothesis and no more.

4.1F1step 3.1∎

No hidden imports. The constructions are strict algebraic ones, and the proof imports no model-category existence, derived mapping-space or descent theorem; the only model-category statement made is the conditional one just proved. No choice principle is used: all constructions are degreewise formulas and all hom-set bijections are given by explicit inverse formulas.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources