Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The fixed-base simplicial cotangent module represents derived derivations

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) and fix a simplicial commutative unital ring A (Simplicial objects, simplicial commutative rings and homotopy groups). For a simplicial A-algebra B, use a free-cell cofibrant replacement P→B in A-algebras augmented to B. The B-module LB/Afixed=Qker⁡(B⊗AP→B), naturally isomorphic to B⊗PΩP/A with differentials computed degreewise, represents relative derived derivations in the supplied fixed-A enriched model: RMapB-Mod(LB/Afixed,M)≃RMapA-alg/B(B,B⊕M). It is independent of the choice of cofibrant replacement P of the fixed augmented object B. Invariance under a weak change of the coefficient/augmentation base is a separate interface. For constant ordinary A,B this agrees canonically with the ordinary cotangent complex via the supplied polynomial-resolution comparison, and it does not by itself assert invariance under weak replacement of A or the global derived-scheme gluing interface.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; a simplicial commutative ring A; a simplicial A-algebra B; a free-cell cofibrant replacement P→B in the augmented slice; M a simplicial B-module.

[F1]

The strict simplicial algebra adjunctions: C↦B⊗AC is left adjoint to restriction, K(I)=B⊕I with (b,x)(c,y)=(bc,by+cx+xy) is left adjoint to I(D)=ker⁡(D→B) and is an equivalence of ordinary categories, and Q(I)=I/(xy) is left adjoint to the zero-multiplication algebra Z(M); the equivalence preserves and reflects weak equivalences (The strict simplicial algebra adjunctions underlying the cotangent construction).

[F2]

The fixed-A simplicial model structures on modules and algebras exist, with fibrations the underlying horn-lifting maps and weak equivalences the normalized additive quasi-isomorphisms; derived mapping spaces are replacement invariant and enriched Quillen adjunctions induce derived mapping equivalences (Model structures for variable simplicial modules and algebras, Replacement-invariant derived enriched mapping spaces).

[F3]

The standard polynomial resolution is admissible; every polynomial resolution whose augmentation is a trivial Kan fibration computes the ordinary cotangent complex, with canonical comparison to the standard resolution, using the normalized differential module B⊗PΩP/A (The standard polynomial resolution has an augmentation contraction and is admissible, Independence of the cotangent complex from the chosen simplicial resolution, Universal Kähler differential module).

Proof

1.1F1F2construct

Cofibrancy in the slice and its kernel. Let P→B be a free-cell cofibrant replacement of B in simplicial A-algebras augmented to B, and put D=B⊗AP with its multiplication augmentation to B and section from B. Extension and restriction along A→B are left and right Quillen because restriction creates fibrations and weak equivalences, so D is cofibrant in the augmented B-algebra category. By [F1] the strict augmented and nonunital equivalences transport D to the cofibrant nonunital B-algebra I=ker⁡(D→B), and Q is left Quillen because Z preserves underlying fibrations and weak equivalences; hence Q(I) is a cofibrant simplicial B-module.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

The chain of enriched adjunctions. For a B-module M, whose underlying additive object is fibrant in the model of [F2], the strict adjunctions of [F1] give natural isomorphisms MapA-alg/B(P,B⊕M)≅MapAugAlgB(B⊗AP,B⊕M)≅MapNUAlgB(I,Z(M))≅MapModB(Q(I),M). All sources and targets are cofibrant and fibrant as required, so these are derived mapping spaces by [F2]; this proves that LB/Afixed=Q(I) represents relative derived derivations.

3.1F1F3step 2.1

The Kähler description. There is an elementwise natural isomorphism between Q(I) and B⊗PΩP/A: an augmented B-linear derivation of D into M is the same as an A-derivation of P into M through P→B, and both are represented by the displayed modules; explicitly, one maps p to the class of 1⊗p minus its augmentation and verifies the Leibniz relation modulo the products I2. The universal derivation corresponds to the identity of the representing module.

3.2F2step 2.1

Independence of the replacement. For two cell cofibrant replacements P1,P2→B, lift P1→P2 over B against the trivial fibration P2→B; the lift is a weak equivalence by two-out-of-three. The mapping corner Map(P1,P2)→Map(P1,B) has boundary lifting by [F2], so the fibre over the prescribed augmentation is contractible and all such lifts give the same homotopy class. Both Pi are fibrant in the augmented slice because Pi→B is a trivial fibration, so the weak comparison is a simplicial homotopy equivalence by the replacement argument of [F2]. The composite enriched left adjoint (extension, kernel equivalence and indecomposables) preserves simplicial homotopies, hence sends that comparison to a simplicial homotopy equivalence of modules and therefore to a normalized quasi-isomorphism. Thus the representing modules are canonically compared in the model homotopy category. Hence LB/Afixed is independent of the choice of P.

4.1F3step 3.1step 3.2discharge-construct∎

Ordinary specialization and scope. For a discrete map A→B, choose P→B by the actual I-cell factorization of the initial map in ordinary A-algebras: in each degree the generating map is a polynomial-ring inclusion on a subset of the simplex variables, a pushout adjoins complementary variables, and a sequential union of polynomial extensions is again a polynomial ring on the union of the variable sets. Hence each Pk is polynomial over ordinary A and its augmentation is a trivial Kan fibration; the ordinary comparison packet [F3] then identifies the fixed-base object with the ordinary cotangent complex of The cotangent complex of a ring map computed on the standard resolution. No invariance under weak replacement of A and no global derived-scheme gluing is asserted here.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources