Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Replacement-invariant derived enriched mapping spaces

Statement

In each supplied simplicial model category of Model structures for variable simplicial modules and algebras, define RMap(X,Y) using functorial cofibrant-fibrant replacements and the constructed simplicial mapping object. These mapping objects are Kan and are invariant under weak equivalences in either variable up to simplicial homotopy equivalence. An enriched Quillen adjunction gives a canonical derived mapping equivalence RMap(LderX,Y)≃RMap(X,RderY) by the actual replacement and adjunction construction. The π0 category of cofibrant-fibrant models is the ordinary localization at the weak equivalences. These assertions concern this explicit enriched homotopy theory; no general coherent localization or strictification theorem is inferred. The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) is assumed for the simultaneous choices in the small-object construction.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A model category from Model structures for variable simplicial modules and algebras with its simplicial mapping object Map, cotensors and functorial factorizations; AC.

[F1]

The model structures exist with weak equivalences detected by normalized additive homology, fibrations the underlying horn-lifting maps, and cofibrations the maps with the left lifting property against maps whose underlying simplicial-set maps lift all boundary inclusions (equivalently, trivial fibrations); generating cofibrations and trivial cofibrations are respectively free objects on boundaries and horns, and the factorizations are functorial (Model structures for variable simplicial modules and algebras).

[F2]

The mapping corner of a cofibration and a fibration is Kan and has boundary lifting when either is acyclic; cotensor corners of a horn-lifting map against a monomorphism have horn lifting, and against a horn or with boundary lifting they have boundary lifting; cotensor path endpoints are Kan and constant paths are weak equivalences for fibrant objects in the appropriate unsliced or relative cotensor (Model structures for variable simplicial modules and algebras, Variable-base cotensor corners and path objects, Simplicial horns and Kan fibrations).

[F3]

A morphism of simplicial sets that is boundary-trivial (a trivial Kan fibration) is a simplicial homotopy equivalence (Trivial simplicial fibrations lift monomorphisms and have contractible products of fibres); weak equivalences of additive objects are normalized quasi-isomorphisms and are stable under homotopy (Normalized simplicial chains, prism homotopies and the abelian trivial-fibration criterion).

Proof

1.1F1F2construct

Definition and fibrancy. For objects X,Y, let Xc→X be the functorial cofibrant replacement and Y→Yf the functorial fibrant replacement; define RMap(X,Y)=Map(Xc,Yf). The mapping corner axiom of [F2] shows that RMap(X,Y) is a Kan simplicial set, since the source Xc is cofibrant and the target Yf is fibrant.

2.1F2F3step 1.1

Target invariance. Let C be cofibrant and let D→D′ be a weak equivalence between fibrant objects. Factor it as a trivial cofibration D→E followed by a trivial fibration E→D′, with E fibrant. A trivial cofibration between fibrant objects is a homotopy equivalence: lifting against the terminal fibration D→∗M gives a retraction r ⁣:E→D with ri=idD (in a slice over B, ∗M is B→idB and the lifting square is a square over B). Lifting against the endpoint fibration Path(E)→E×∗ME, using the constant path on i as the map from D and (ir,idE) as the map from E, gives a homotopy ir≃idE; in a slice the path object is EΔ[1]×BΔ[1]B and both endpoints lie over the same section of B. Mapping from the cofibrant C preserves simplicial homotopies and sends trivial fibrations to boundary-trivial maps by the corner axiom, which are homotopy equivalences by [F3]. Hence Map(C,D)→Map(C,E)→Map(C,D′) are homotopy equivalences, proving invariance in the target.

2.2F2F3step 1.1

Source invariance. Let D be fibrant and let C→C′ be a weak equivalence between cofibrant objects. A trivial cofibration between cofibrant objects becomes boundary-trivial after mapping into D by the corner axiom; a trivial fibration q ⁣:C→C′ between cofibrant objects has a section s obtained by lifting ∅→C′ through q (using cofibrancy of C′), and the cotensor corner q∂Δ[1] is boundary-trivial by [F2]; lifting the cofibration ∅→C into it with endpoints sq and idC and the constant path on q produces a homotopy sq≃idC over C′, so q is a homotopy equivalence and the contravariant mapping maps are homotopy equivalences. Factoring a general weak equivalence between cofibrant objects into a trivial cofibration followed by a trivial fibration gives invariance in the source.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2

Enriched adjunction. Let L⊣R be an enriched Quillen adjunction, so R preserves fibrations and trivial fibrations. For cofibrant C and fibrant D the enriched adjunction gives a strict isomorphism Map(LC,D)≅Map(C,RD), and LC is cofibrant while RD is fibrant; composing with the replacement comparisons of steps 2.1 and 2.2 yields the canonical derived mapping equivalence RMap(LX,Y)≃RMap(X,RY) for cofibrant-fibrant representatives. The Quillen adjunction condition itself is the lifting formulation of Model categories and Quillen adjunctions.

4.1F1F2F3step 2.2discharge-construct∎

The π0 interface. The functorial cofibrant then fibrant replacement supplies natural weak-equivalence zigzags between every object and a cofibrant-fibrant model, and weak maps between such models are homotopy equivalences by steps 2.1-2.2. Simplicially homotopic maps agree in the localization because the constant-path map is a weak equivalence with both endpoints as inverses; hence the category of homotopy classes of maps between cofibrant-fibrant models has the universal localization property for the weak equivalences. This proves the asserted π0 description with no independent hammock, infinity-categorical localization or coherent-diagram strictification claimed.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources