Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The standard polynomial resolution has an augmentation contraction and is admissible

Statement

Let A→B be a map of commutative unital rings (Commutative ring) and let P∙=((A[−]U)n+1(B))n be its standard polynomial simplicial resolution (The standard simplicial resolution of a ring map), where U forgets the algebra structure. Its augmentation P∙→B is termwise surjective, a homotopy equivalence of underlying simplicial sets over the constant set B, and a trivial Kan fibration. Its associated A-module complex is a free resolution of B, so P∙ is an admissible polynomial resolution for computing cotangent complexes.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A map A→B of commutative unital rings and its standard resolution P∙→B with Pn=A[Pn−1], faces and degeneracies induced by the counit and unit of the free-forgetful adjunction.

[F1]

P0=A[B], Pn=A[Pn−1]; the free-forgetful adjunction has unit η ⁣:idSet→UA[−], comultiplication A[−]ηU:A[−]U→(A[−]U)2, and counit ϵ ⁣:A[U(−)]→id; the augmentation P0→B is induced by the structure map of B; each Pn is a polynomial A-algebra, hence a free A-module on its monomials (The standard simplicial resolution of a ring map, The polynomial ring R[xi:i∈I] as finitely supported coefficient families on monomials).

[F2]

A termwise surjective homomorphism of simplicial abelian groups inducing a quasi-isomorphism of associated complexes is a trivial Kan fibration; a homomorphism of simplicial abelian groups that is a homotopy equivalence of underlying simplicial sets induces a quasi-isomorphism on associated complexes (Normalized simplicial chains, prism homotopies and the abelian trivial-fibration criterion).

Proof

1.1F1givenconstruct

The extra degeneracy. Let t ⁣:Pn→Pn+1 be the map x↦[x] induced by the unit of the free-forgetful adjunction, including the augmented map B→P0=A[B]. Directly on the nested polynomial expressions defining P, the adjunction triangle identities give d0t=id, di+1t=tdi, si+1t=tsi and s0t=tt, with the augmented interpretations in degrees −1 and 0. These identities say that t is an extra degeneracy for the augmented simplicial set underlying P∙→B.

2.1F1step 1.1

Homotopy over B. For an order-preserving map α ⁣:[n]→[1] with r initial zeros, consider the map trd0r ⁣:Pn→Pn, where d0r is interpreted using the augmentation when r=n+1. Write this map as Hn,r. The identities of step 1.1 give djHn,r=Hn−1,r−1dj for j<r and djHn,r=Hn−1,rdj for j≥r; similarly sjHn,r=Hn+1,r+1sj for j<r and sjHn,r=Hn+1,rsj for j≥r. At the all-zero endpoint r=n+1, the repeated face map lands in B and the same identities use the augmentation. Deleting or repeating the j-th vertex of α changes its number of initial zeros by exactly the stated amount. Since faces and degeneracies generate all order maps, these equations prove simplicial naturality, so the maps assemble into a simplicial homotopy over B from the composite of the augmentation with the constant section b↦[…[b]… ] (the all-zero endpoint) to the identity of P∙ (the all-one endpoint). Augmentation followed by that section is therefore homotopic to the identity, while the other composite is the identity on B; hence the augmentation is a homotopy equivalence of underlying simplicial sets over B. Every augmentation map Pn→B is surjective because the nested variables [b] lift every b∈B.

3.1F1F2step 2.1discharge-construct∎

Admissibility. By [F2] the underlying-set homotopy equivalence of step 2.1 makes the associated chain map of abelian groups a quasi-isomorphism, and the termwise surjectivity of the augmentation then makes P∙→B a trivial Kan fibration. Each Pn is a free A-module by [F1], so the associated complex, reindexed cohomologically in nonpositive degrees, is a complex of free A-modules with H0=B and vanishing higher homology; it is therefore a free resolution of B, and P∙ is admissible for computing cotangent complexes. The extra degeneracy is only a map of sets, not an algebra-linear chain contraction; it is the normalization and prism lemma [F2] that passes the contraction from underlying simplicial sets to module homology.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by The standard simplicial resolution of a ring map.

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources