How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The rank-one root-power quotient is a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra
Statement
Let be odd and let be a primitive -th root of unity. In the rank-one De Concini–Kac specialization of De Concini–Kac, Lusztig, and small quantum-group forms at roots of unity, the ordered monomials form a -basis. With the local coproduct convention the two-sided ideal is stable under the coproduct, counit , , and antipode , , . The quotient is a Hopf algebra with basis and therefore has dimension .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The rank-one root forms of De Concini–Kac, Lusztig, and small quantum-group forms at roots of unity, a primitive odd root of order , and the Hopf-algebra axioms of Hopf algebras and antipodes.
The rank-one De Concini–Kac algebra is generated by with relations , , and , where (The Drinfeld-Jimbo quantized enveloping algebra by generators and relations, De Concini–Kac, Lusztig, and small quantum-group forms at roots of unity).
Since is primitive of odd order , and is primitive of order (De Concini–Kac, Lusztig, and small quantum-group forms at roots of unity).
A Hopf algebra is a bialgebra with a two-sided convolution inverse of its identity map; equivalently, the two antipode equations hold (Hopf algebras and antipodes).
In the generic rank-one algebra generated by , the ordered monomials span and are linearly independent (Divided-power commutation and the simple string modules, clause (i)).
Proof
Work first over with . Combine adjacent powers of as elements of the group algebra , and rewrite , , and . Count inversions in the order , with a second measure equal to the number of and symbols. The first two rules decrease the inversion count; the term of the third decreases it and its term lowers the second measure. Thus every word reduces after finitely many steps to an -linear combination of the ordered monomials . The same rules remain valid after by [F2].
Define a unital algebra-map candidate and a counit candidate by the displayed formulas, with and ; define an anti-algebra-map candidate by the displayed formulas, with . For toral conjugation, direct multiplication gives and . For the mixed relation, expand the coproduct commutator: the two cross terms cancel since and , leaving . The counit assignments preserve each relation. For the antipode assignment, applying the anti-map to the two toral relations gives and . Applying it to gives . Thus descend to .
For , telescoping gives ; moving through by and gives . At both geometric sums vanish because for one has , , and by [F2]; hence commutes with and it commutes with as well. Similarly, ; using and gives , whose sums also vanish at , so commutes with and already commutes with . Finally commutes with since . Thus are central and is a two-sided ideal.
The map from the rank-one algebra over presented by the three relations in [F1] with in place of onto the -subalgebra generated by is surjective by construction, and step 1.1 shows that its source is spanned by . Their images are linearly independent in the generic algebra by [F4]; hence the map is injective and the -source is free with that basis. Tensoring this free module along preserves the basis. Thus has the stated rank-one presentation and PBW basis.
On the two iterated coproducts are . On they both equal , and on they both equal ; hence coassociativity holds on generators. The two counit composites give on each generator: for they are and , and for they are and , while is sent to and . Both counit composites and both iterated coproducts are algebra maps, so these identities hold on all of . For the antipode equations, on they are ; on they are and ; on they are and . Since , both equations also hold on the unit. If both equations hold for and , then anti-multiplicativity of and multiplicativity of give and . Induction on word length proves the antipode equations on all of , so it is a Hopf algebra by [F3].
If , induction starts at with and and gives , where and, for , . Multiplying the expansion on the right by shows the coefficient recurrence . For the product formula, putting those two terms over leaves the common numerator times , exactly the product formula for . Thus the formula follows inductively whenever its denominators are nonzero. For or and , the denominator is nonzero and the numerator contains , so all intermediate coefficients vanish. In the summands and satisfy ; in the summands and satisfy . Applying the formula to these two pairs gives and . Also . The counit kills all three generators. Since is odd, and , with , we have and , both in ; also . The sum is a two-sided ideal of , so the coproduct inclusions for the three generators extend to all of because is multiplicative. The counit kills the ideal because it kills its generators, and the anti-multiplicative antipode preserves the ideal because it sends each generator into . Therefore the quotient operations are well-defined and satisfy the Hopf identities inherited from .
By the PBW basis in step 2.1 and centrality in step 1.3, the ideal generated by is spanned by monomials with or , leaving a basis indexed by and . Modulo one has , so each toral coefficient is represented by a polynomial in ; division by the monic polynomial gives a unique remainder of degree less than . Thus the quotient basis is exactly with . There are such elements, so the quotient has dimension .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof and Mykola Semenyakin, A Brief Introduction to Quantum Groups (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pavel Etingof, Shlomo Gelaki, Dmitri Nikshych, and Victor Ostrik, Tensor Categories (standard reference, not scraped)