Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Divided-power commutation and the simple Uqi(sl2) string modules

Statement

Fix a symmetrizable Cartan datum (I,A,D,P,P∨,q), an index i∈I, and put qi=qdi. Let Uq(g) be the Drinfeld–Jimbo algebra and let Ai be the subalgebra generated by Ei,Fi,Ki±1 (The Drinfeld-Jimbo quantized enveloping algebra by generators and relations, Positive, negative and toral quantum subalgebras and their root gradings); write x(m):=xm/[m]i! for the divided powers of Quantum integers, factorials, Gaussian binomials and divided powers at qi.

(i) The assignment e↦Ei, f↦Fi, k↦Ki, k−1↦Ki−1 defines an algebra isomorphism from the standard rank-one algebra A over Q(q), presented by e,f,k±1 with kek−1=qi2e, kfk−1=qi−2f and [e,f]=(k−k−1)/(qi−qi−1) onto Ai; the images of the monomials FiaKimEib (a,b≥0, m∈Z) are linearly independent in Uq(g), being images of the PBW monomials of the triangular decomposition (Triangular decomposition of a quantized enveloping algebra).

(ii) For all a,b≥0, KiEi(a)Ki−1=qi2aEi(a) and KiFi(b)Ki−1=qi−2bFi(b), and for b≥1 the divided powers satisfy the exact commutation formula EiFi(b)=Fi(b)Ei+Fi(b−1)qib−qi−b∑s=0b−1(qi−2sKi−qi2sKi−1); iterating it computes Ei(a)Fi(b) as a finite sum of monomials Fi(b−t)KimEi(a−t) (0≤t≤min⁡(a,b)) with coefficients in Q(q).

(iii) For every N≥0 there is a simple Ai-module Li(N) of dimension N+1: it is the quotient of the cyclic module M~(N):=Ai/(AiEi+Ai(Ki−qiN)) by the submodule generated by Fi(N+1)wN, where wN is the image of 1, with basis the images vt of Fi(t)wN, 0≤t≤N, on which Kivt=qiN−2tvt, Fivt=[t+1]ivt+1 and Eivt=[N−t+1]ivt−1 (with v−1=vN+1=0); Li(N) is the unique simple Ai-module generated by a vector v≠0 with Eiv=0, Kiv=qiNv and FiN+1v=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A symmetrizable Cartan datum, an index i, and the subalgebra Ai generated by Ei,Fi,Ki±1.

[F1]

EiFi−FiEi=(Ki−Ki−1)/(qi−qi−1); KiEiKi−1=qi2Ei and KiFiKi−1=qi−2Fi; Ki−1=K−dihi is the inverse of Ki (The Drinfeld-Jimbo quantized enveloping algebra by generators and relations).

[F2]

Ai is the subalgebra generated by Ei,Fi,Ki±1; the universal property of Uq(g) assigns a homomorphism to every assignment satisfying the defining relations; the same quotient universal property applies to the explicit rank-one presentation (The Drinfeld-Jimbo quantized enveloping algebra by generators and relations, Positive, negative and toral quantum subalgebras and their root gradings, A ring homomorphism whose kernel contains a two-sided ideal factors uniquely through the quotient ring).

[F3]

[m]i=(qim−qi−m)/(qi−qi−1), [m]i!=∏k=1m[k]i, x(m)=xm/[m]i!, and qi−qi−1≠0 (Quantum integers, factorials, Gaussian binomials and divided powers at qi).

[F4]

Triangular decomposition: the multiplication map Uq−⊗Uq0⊗Uq+→Uq(g) is an isomorphism, so the images of the monomials FiaKimEib are linearly independent and span the rank-one subalgebra Ai (Triangular decomposition of a quantized enveloping algebra); only the unconditional tensor-decomposition clauses (i)–(ii) of that supplier are needed here.

[F5]

The independent coroots and di>0 make mdihi distinct for distinct integers m (Symmetrizable Cartan data for quantum groups). The finite geometric-sum identities ∑s=0b−1qi±2s=(qi±2b−1)/(qi±2−1) hold because q is transcendental and di>0; likewise [m]i≠0 for m≥1 by [F3].

Proof

technique · prove the divided-power identities by a two-term induction on the exponent, then build the cyclic module $\widetilde M(N)$ and its quotient and compute the action on the string vectors; the rank-one normal basis identifies the cyclic quotient and proves its string vectors are independent. In the infinite cyclic module, extend the integer notation to $s\in\mathbb Z$ by $[s]_i=(q_i^s-q_i^{-s})/(q_i-q_i^{-1})$; this agrees with [F3] for $s\ge0$ and gives $[-s]_i=-[s]_i$
1.1F1F3algebra

Weight rules. By [F1], KiEiaKi−1=qi2aEia and KiFibKi−1=qi−2bFib for all a,b≥0 by induction on the exponent via multiplicativity of conjugation; dividing by the nonzero scalars [a]i! and [b]i! of [F3] gives KiEi(a)Ki−1=qi2aEi(a) and KiFi(b)Ki−1=qi−2bFi(b).

1.2F1F3algebra

Commutation induction. Put c:=1/(qi−qi−1) and Tb:=c∑s=0b−1(qi−2sKi−qi2sKi−1) for b≥1. We prove EiFib=FibEi+Fib−1Tb by induction on b. For b=1 this is [F1]. For the induction step, EiFib=(EiFib−1)Fi=(Fib−1Ei+Fib−2Tb−1)Fi=Fib−1(FiEi+c(Ki−Ki−1))+Fib−2Tb−1Fi, and [F1] gives Tb−1Fi=Fi c∑t=1b−1(qi−2tKi−qi2tKi−1)=Fi(Tb−c(Ki−Ki−1)) after reindexing s=t−1; the two correction terms cancel and the identity follows.

2.1F3step 1.1step 1.2algebra

Divided-power formula. Dividing the identity of 1.2 by [b]i! gives EiFi(b)=Fi(b)Ei+Fi(b−1)Tb[b]i,Tb[b]i=1qib−qi−b∑s=0b−1(qi−2sKi−qi2sKi−1), because Fib−1/[b]i!=Fi(b−1)/[b]i and [b]i=(qib−qi−b)/(qi−qi−1); this is the displayed formula of (ii). Multiplying the formula for Ei and for Ei(a−1) on the left and using EiFi(b)=Fi(b)Ei+… repeatedly computes Ei(a)Fi(b) as a finite sum of monomials Fi(b−t)KimEi(a−t) with 0≤t≤min⁡(a,b), since each application of the formula moves one Ei to the right at the cost of one Fi-power.

3.1F1F3F4F5step 1.1step 2.1construct

The cyclic module. Let M~(N):=Ai/(AiEi+Ai(Ki−qiN)) and wN:=1+(AiEi+Ai(Ki−qiN)). Every element of Ai is a finite Q(q)-linear combination of monomials FitKimEia with t,a≥0 and m∈Z: words are rearranged with [F1] and 1.1, and each application of the identity of 2.1 moves one Ei to the right of an Fi-power at the cost of one Fi-power and finitely many K-factors, so the rearrangement terminates. By [F4] these normal monomials are a basis. The left ideal AiEi is their span with a>0. Modulo that span, a product from Ai(Ki−qiN) with positive Ei-exponent still has positive exponent after toral crossing, and its terms with exponent zero are exactly Fitp(Ki)(Ki−qiN) for Laurent polynomials p. Thus the remaining toral factor is quotiented by evaluation Ki=qiN, and the cyclic quotient has basis the images of Fit, t≥0; a toral monomial FitKim maps to qiNmFit, not to zero. Writing vt:=Fi(t)wN for t≥0, the relations [F1] and 1.1 give Kivt=qiN−2tvt (using Ki=Kdihi and αi(dihi)=2di), Fivt=FiFi(t)wN=[t+1]iFi(t+1)wN=[t+1]ivt+1 by [F3], and, using 2.1 with a=1, Eivt=Fi(t−1)1qit−qi−t∑s=0t−1(qiN−2s−qi2s−N)wN, for t≥1, and Eiv0=0; the bracket equals [N−t+1]i by the geometric-sum identity [F5].

4.1F3F4step 3.1algebra

The quotient and its action. Let Li(N):=M~(N)/AiFi(N+1)wN. The submodule AiFi(N+1)wN is spanned by the Fi(t)wN with t≥N+1: it is contained in that span by the action formulas of 3.1, and it contains them because Fi(t)wN=Fi(t−N−1)Fi(N+1)wN up to the nonzero scalar [t]i!/[t−N−1]i![N+1]i! by [F3]. Hence in Li(N) the vectors v0,…,vN satisfy the displayed action formulas with v−1=vN+1=0, and they span Li(N); their nonvanishing and independence follow from the cyclic-module basis in step 3.1, since the specified tail submodule is spanned by the disjoint basis indices t≥N+1.

5.1F3step 4.1algebra

Simplicity and uniqueness. Let W⊆Li(N) be a nonzero submodule and pick 0≠w=∑t≤Tctvt with T maximal and cT≠0. By 3.1, EiTw=[N]i[N−1]i⋯[N−T+1]icTv0 (each application of Ei lowers the index by one with the stated nonzero scalar; all displayed scalars are nonzero because [m]i≠0 for m≥1 by [F3] and the nonvanishing of qi2m−1), so v0∈W; then Fitv0=[t]i!vt puts every vt in W, so W=Li(N) and Li(N) is simple and generated by wN with EiwN=0, KiwN=qiNwN and FiN+1wN=0. Conversely, if V is any simple Ai-module generated by v≠0 with these three properties, then the assignment 1↦v defines a surjection M~(N)→V whose kernel contains Fi(N+1)wN by the third property, hence factors through Li(N); as Li(N) is simple and V≠0, this map is an isomorphism, which gives the asserted uniqueness.

6.1F1F2F4F5algebra∎

Part (i). The generators Ei,Fi,Ki±1 satisfy precisely the explicit rank-one relations by [F1], so sending e,f,k to them gives a surjective map A→Ai by the quotient universal property in [F2]. The same finite rearrangement used in step 3.1 shows that fakmeb spans this presented rank-one algebra; its torus here is generated by k alone, rather than by additional lattice roots of k. In the full algebra, the pure color-i component of either separate half has one word and no Serre relation, so its powers are nonzero and independent. The toral powers Kim=Kmdihi are distinct because the datum's coroots are independent and di>0. By the tensor decomposition [F4], the images FiaKimEib are therefore independent. The spanning rank-one monomials have independent images, proving injectivity and the claimed isomorphism.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources