How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Slicing lemma: large subpairs remain regular and their density shifts by at most
Statement
Let be -regular, and let , satisfy and , where . Then and is -regular for
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The pair and subsets in the Statement.
An -regular pair has every subpair whose two sides meet the relative-size thresholds within of its density (-regular pairs and self-regular vertex sets).
Proof
Since and , [L1] gives .
Let and satisfy and . Then and similarly .
By [L1], ; combining this with step 1.1 yields .
Since were arbitrary at the thresholds, is -regular.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Y. Zhao, Graph Theory and Additive Combinatorics, Exercise 2.1.4 (standard reference, not scraped)