How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A -regular pair restricted to two half-sized subsets is -regular
Statement
If is -regular and , satisfy and , then is -regular and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A pair and subsets satisfying the Statement.
The slicing lemma gives new parameter and density shift at most for restrictions of relative sizes at least (Slicing lemma: large subpairs remain regular and their density shifts by at most ).
Verification
Substitute and in [L1]. Each of , , and equals .
The same application of [L1] retains the density-shift bound , proving both decimal-form assertions in the Statement.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 3 results over 3 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Y. Zhao, Graph Theory and Additive Combinatorics, Exercise 2.1.4 (standard reference, not scraped)