Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Small-step implicit Runge–Kutta stages have a unique branch and controlled residual error

Statement

Let m,d≥1, h>0, A∈Rm×m, and centers c=(c1,…,cm)∈(Rd)m. On block vectors define

∥Y∥∞,2:=max⁡1≤i≤m∥Yi∥2,∥A∥∞:=max⁡i∑j=1m∣aij∣.

Let F:B→(Rd)m, with components Fi:B→Rd, be defined on the closed product ball B={Y:∥Y−c∥∞,2≤R}, where R>0. Suppose constants M,L≥0 satisfy, for all Y,Z∈B,

∥F(Y)∥∞,2≤M,∥F(Y)−F(Z)∥∞,2≤L∥Y−Z∥∞,2,

and h∥A∥∞M≤R, q:=h∥A∥∞L<1. Define Φ(Y)=c+h(A⊗Id)F(Y) and G(Y)=Y−Φ(Y). Then Φ has a unique fixed point Y∗∈B, equivalently G(Y∗)=0. Every approximate stage vector Y~∈B satisfies

∥Y~−Y∗∥∞,2≤∥G(Y~)∥∞,21−q.

If the derivative-scaled stage residual is r=G(Y~)/h, the right side is h∥r∥∞,2/(1−q). The hypotheses h∥A∥∞L<1 and the invariant-ball bound are local solvability conditions; this result gives no global branch outside B.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite-dimensional block space, h,A,c,R,F,M,L, the product ball B, and the inequalities in the Statement. The residual G uses the update-residual scaling of Implicit residuals and their update and derivative units; for Runge–Kutta stages it is the block residual defined by Implicit Runge–Kutta stage equations and update.

[F1]

The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn defines the Euclidean inner product and norm on each Rd.

[F5]
[F6]

Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space: every Cauchy sequence in a complete metric space converges to a point of that space.

[A1]

R>0, h∥A∥∞M≤R, and q=h∥A∥∞L<1.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3F5F6construct

The formula d(Y,Z)=∥Y−Z∥∞,2 satisfies the metric axioms [F5]: symmetry and separation hold coordinatewise from the Euclidean norm, while the triangle inequality follows from [F2] in each block and then taking the maximum. The ball B is nonempty because it contains c. Any Cauchy sequence in (B,d) is Cauchy in each of its m Euclidean coordinates, so [F3] gives coordinate limits Yi. Since ∥Yi−ci∥2≤∥Yi−Yi(n)∥2+∥Yi(n)−ci∥2, passing to the limit shows ∥Yi−ci∥2≤R; hence the block limit lies in B. By [F6], (B,d) is complete.

1.2givenA1F1F2algebra

For each block i, the Euclidean triangle inequality and homogeneity give ∥∑jaijFj(Y)∥2≤∑j∣aij∣∥Fj(Y)∥2≤(∑j∣aij∣)M; taking the maximum over i gives ∥Φ(Y)−c∥∞,2≤h∥A∥∞M≤R, so Φ(Y)∈B. Applying the same blockwise estimate to F(Y)−F(Z) gives ∥Φ(Y)−Φ(Z)∥∞,2≤h∥A∥∞L∥Y−Z∥∞,2=q∥Y−Z∥∞,2.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F4

The hypotheses of [F4] hold by step 1.1 and step 1.2, so there is exactly one Y∗∈B with Φ(Y∗)=Y∗. The equation Φ(Y∗)=Y∗ is equivalent to G(Y∗)=0 by the definition of G.

3.1A1step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

For any Y~∈B, G(Y~)=Y~−Φ(Y~) and Y∗=Φ(Y∗), so ∥Y~−Y∗∥∞,2≤∥G(Y~)∥∞,2+∥Φ(Y~)−Φ(Y∗)∥∞,2≤∥G(Y~)∥∞,2+q∥Y~−Y∗∥∞,2. Since 1−q>0, rearranging proves the stated residual-to-stage-error bound, and G(Y~)=hr proves the derivative-scaled form.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

53 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources