Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two-stage Radau IIA has order three and is scalar L-stable

Statement

For the tableau in Two-stage Radau IIA tableau, on a C3 vector field and the local small-step branch specified by Small-step implicit Runge–Kutta stages have a unique branch and controlled residual error, the local defect is O(h4), so the method has classical order at least three. Its scalar stability function is R(z)=1+z/31−2z/3+z2/6, and it is L-stable in the scalar sense of Scalar stability function, A-stability, and L-stability for Runge–Kutta methods. No nonlinear contractivity assertion follows.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Radau IIA tableau, a C3 vector field on an open neighborhood of an exact solution segment, and a sufficiently small step with an invariant stage ball containing the selected solution.

[F1]

Two-stage Radau IIA tableau: A=(5/12−1/123/41/4), b=(3/4,1/4)T, and c=(1/3,1)T; c is the row-sum vector and the final row is bT.

[F2]

Implicit Runge–Kutta stage equations and update: the stages solve Yi=y+h∑jaijf(t+cjh,Yj) and the update is y+h∑ibif(t+cih,Yi).

[F3]

Small-step implicit Runge–Kutta stages have a unique branch and controlled residual error: if F is bounded by M, is L-Lipschitz on an invariant product ball of radius R, h∥A∥∞M≤R, and h∥A∥∞L<1, there is a unique stage fixed point in that ball.

[F4]

Multivariable Taylor formula with a Lagrange remainder along a line segment gives the Lagrange remainder for each scalar component on a convex segment. The supplier is scalar-valued. For a vector map F:U⊂Rs→Rd, apply it separately to each real component Fi; its intermediate points θi may differ. If the absolute values of all order-(k+1) component partial derivatives on the segment are at most M, each component remainder is at most MCs,k∥v∥2k+1, where Cs,k=∑∣α∣=k+11/α! is a fixed finite constant, since ∣vα∣≤∥v∥2k+1. Hence the Euclidean remainder is at most dMCs,k∥v∥2k+1. In one time variable the max-norm bound is M∣h∣k+1/(k+1)!. No common intermediate point for all components is asserted.

[A1]

The derivatives of the augmented field Q(t,y)=(1,f(t,y)) through order three are bounded on the local compact tube.

Proof

1.1F1algebra

The row sums of A equal c, bT is the final row of A, and direct arithmetic gives ∑ibi=1,bTc=3413+14=12,bTc2=3419+14=13. Also Ac=(1/18,1/2)T, so bTAc=(3/4)(1/18)+(1/4)(1/2)=1/6.

1.2A1F2F3F4algebra

Augment the equation by Q(t,y)=(1,f(t,y)). Because the rows of A sum to c, the augmented stage times are exactly t+cih. Write Ki=Q(Xi) for augmented stage derivatives. The invariant-ball bound [F3] gives Xi−X=O(h), and the componentwise norm estimate [F4] yields, uniformly on the local tube, Ki=Q+hciQ′Q+h2(∑jaijcjQ′Q′Q+ci22Q′′(Q,Q))+O(h3). Indeed first Kj=Q+O(h) gives Xi−X=hciQ+O(h2); substituting this into the first-order Taylor expansion gives the hciQ′Q term, and substituting once more into the second-order Taylor expansion gives the displayed h2 terms, with O(h3) remainder because Q∈C3 and its third derivative is bounded.

1.3F1F2algebra

On y′=λy, direct solution of the two-stage linear system gives det⁡(I−zA)=1−2z3+z26,1+zbT(I−zA)−11=1+z/31−2z/3+z2/6. Stiff accuracy makes the update the second stage, so this is the stated scalar stability function.

2.1A1F1F2F4step 1.1step 1.2algebra

Multiplying the expansion of step 1.2 by hbi and summing gives X+hQ+h22Q′Q+h36(Q′′(Q,Q)+Q′Q′Q)+O(h4), using all four identities in step 1.1. The exact solution has the same expansion: X′=Q, X′′=Q′Q, and X′′′=Q′′(Q,Q)+Q′Q′Q; applying scalar Taylor separately to each time-coordinate function, with the componentwise norm estimate in [F4] and the bounded fourth derivative obtained from X′=Q(X) and Q∈C3, gives remainder O(h4). Thus the local defect is O(h4).

3.1F1step 1.3algebra∎

Put w=−z=s+it, s≥0. Expanding real and imaginary parts gives ∣1+2w3+w26∣2−∣1−w3∣2=2s+23s2+29s3+136s4+(2s9+s218)t2+t436≥0. If the denominator vanished, this inequality would force the numerator to vanish; the numerator 1−w/3 vanishes only at w=3, where the denominator is 1+2+9/6≠0. Hence there are no poles for Re⁡z≤0, and the inequality gives ∣R(z)∣≤1 there. Since the numerator degree is one and denominator degree is two, R(z)→0 as ∣z∣→∞ in that half-plane. This is scalar L-stability.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources