Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Standard client dissimilarity implies the gap form with unchanged parameters

Statement

Let N,d≥1 be positive integers, let β>0, and let fi:Rd→R be differentiable with β-Lipschitz gradients. Put f=N−1∑ifi, and suppose f(x)≥f⋆ for all x, where f⋆∈R is finite. Then ∥∇f(x)∥22≤2β(f(x)−f⋆)(x∈Rd). Consequently, if the clients satisfy standard (G,B)-bounded gradient dissimilarity, with G≥0 and B≥1, they satisfy the gap-form condition with exactly the same G,B,β,f⋆: 1N∑i∥∇fi(x)∥22≤G2+2βB2(f(x)−f⋆)(x∈Rd). No convexity or attainment of the lower bound is required for this implication.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The differentiable client functions, common smoothness constant, finite lower bound and, for the consequence, the standard condition in the Statement.

[F1]

Gradient of a finite sum is the finite sum of gradients: ∇f=N−1∑i∇fi.

[F3]

Descent inequality for a Lipschitz gradient: a continuously differentiable function with β-Lipschitz gradient satisfies f(y)≤f(x)+⟨∇f(x),y−x⟩+(β/2)∥y−x∥22.

[F4]

Standard and gap forms of bounded client gradient dissimilarity: standard dissimilarity bounds the population second moment by G2+B2∥∇f(x)∥22.

Proof

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

By [F1], ∇f(u)−∇f(v)=N−1∑i(∇fi(u)−∇fi(v)). The triangle inequality and homogeneity in [F2] imply ∥∇f(u)−∇f(v)∥2≤N−1∑iβ∥u−v∥2=β∥u−v∥2. Thus f is continuously differentiable and has β-Lipschitz gradient, as required by [F3].

2.1F2F3step 1.1givenconstructalgebra

Fix x and set y=x−β−1∇f(x). By [F3] and the finite global lower bound, f⋆≤f(y)≤f(x)−β−1∥∇f(x)∥22+(2β)−1∥∇f(x)∥22=f(x)−(2β)−1∥∇f(x)∥22. Rearrangement proves the first displayed inequality. The point y lies in the domain Rd; the use of β−1 is valid because β>0.

3.1F4step 2.1givenalgebra∎

Multiply step 2.1 by the nonnegative B2 and substitute it into [F4]. This gives the asserted gap form, with no enlargement of G or B and the factor exactly 2β.

Remarks

The reverse implication with the same parameters need not hold, even for strongly convex clients. For example, on R take f1(x)=x2/2 and f2(x)=3x2/2. Their equal-client mean is f(x)=x2, its minimum is 0, and both clients are 1-strongly convex and 3-smooth. The population gradient second moment is 5x2, while ∥∇f(x)∥22=4x2. The gap form holds with G=0,B=1,β=3 because 5x2≤6x2, whereas the standard form with the same G,B would require 5x2≤4x2. Keeping the gap branch therefore retains instances beyond the same-parameter standard condition.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources