How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Standard client dissimilarity implies the gap form with unchanged parameters
Statement
Let be positive integers, let , and let be differentiable with -Lipschitz gradients. Put , and suppose for all , where is finite. Then Consequently, if the clients satisfy standard -bounded gradient dissimilarity, with and , they satisfy the gap-form condition with exactly the same : No convexity or attainment of the lower bound is required for this implication.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The differentiable client functions, common smoothness constant, finite lower bound and, for the consequence, the standard condition in the Statement.
Cauchy-Schwarz with its equality case, the triangle inequality for , the parallelogram law and polarisation and The Euclidean inner product on : Euclidean norms satisfy the triangle inequality, positive homogeneity, and .
Descent inequality for a Lipschitz gradient: a continuously differentiable function with -Lipschitz gradient satisfies .
Standard and gap forms of bounded client gradient dissimilarity: standard dissimilarity bounds the population second moment by .
Proof
By [F1], . The triangle inequality and homogeneity in [F2] imply . Thus is continuously differentiable and has -Lipschitz gradient, as required by [F3].
Fix and set . By [F3] and the finite global lower bound, . Rearrangement proves the first displayed inequality. The point lies in the domain ; the use of is valid because .
Multiply step 2.1 by the nonnegative and substitute it into [F4]. This gives the asserted gap form, with no enlargement of or and the factor exactly .
Remarks
The reverse implication with the same parameters need not hold, even for strongly convex clients. For example, on take and . Their equal-client mean is , its minimum is , and both clients are -strongly convex and -smooth. The population gradient second moment is , while . The gap form holds with because , whereas the standard form with the same would require . Keeping the gap branch therefore retains instances beyond the same-parameter standard condition.
Depends on
- Standard and gap forms of bounded client gradient dissimilarity
- Descent inequality for a Lipschitz gradient
- Gradient of a finite sum is the finite sum of gradients
- Cauchy-Schwarz $\lvert\langle x,y\rangle\rvert \le \lVert x\rVert_2\lVert y\rVert_2$ with its equality case, the triangle inequality for $\lVert\cdot\rVert_2$, the parallelogram law and polarisation
- The Euclidean inner product $\langle x,y\rangle = \sum_{k<n} x_k y_k$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Karimireddy et al., SCAFFOLD, Section 2 (A1) and Appendix D.1, equations (13)–(14) (standard reference, not scraped)