Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A strong Wolfe step exists on a bounded-below descent ray

Statement

Let D⊆Rn be open, let f:D→R be C1, and let x∈D and p≠0 satisfy x+tp∈D for every t≥0. Let ϕ(t)=f(x+tp) and suppose ϕ′(0)<0 and ϕ is bounded below on [0,∞). For the constants 0<c1<c2<1/2 of Wolfe and strong Wolfe line-search conditions, the set of positive strong Wolfe steps contains a nonempty open interval.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: D,f,x,p,ϕ,c1,c2 as in the Statement.

[F1]

Wolfe and strong Wolfe line-search conditions: ϕ(t)=f(x+tp); a strong Wolfe step satisfies ϕ(t)≤ϕ(0)+c1tϕ′(0) and ∣ϕ′(t)∣≤c2∣ϕ′(0)∣, with 0<c1<c2<1/2.

[F2]

The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a): if a real function is continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b), then for some c∈(a,b) its endpoint increment equals f′(c)(b−a).

[F4]

Every nonempty set bounded below has an infimum: every nonempty subset of R that is bounded below has an infimum, characterized as its greatest lower bound.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses and notation in the Statement.

1.1givenF1F3algebrachoose

The chain rule in [F1] makes ϕ continuously differentiable on a neighborhood of each finite point of [0,∞). Define ψ(t):=ϕ(t)−ϕ(0)−c1tϕ′(0). Then ψ(0)=0 and d:=ψ′(0)=(1−c1)ϕ′(0)<0. By [F3], ψ(t)/t→d as t→0. Choose δ>0 so that ψ(t)/t<d/2<0 for 0<t<δ; hence ψ(t)<0 there.

2.1givenF4step 1.1choosealgebra

Since ϕ is bounded below and −c1ϕ′(0)>0, ψ(t)→+∞ as t→+∞. Thus S:={t>0:ψ(t)≥0} is nonempty and bounded below by 0, so [F4] gives t∗:=inf⁡S. Step 1.1 shows that S has no points near 0, hence t∗>0. Every s∈(0,t∗) has ψ(s)<0, while the defining approximation property of the infimum gives points of S arbitrarily close above t∗. Continuity of ψ therefore forces ψ(t∗)=0.

3.1givenF1F2step 2.1algebra

Every s∈(0,t∗) has ψ(s)<0, so Armijo holds strictly throughout that interval. Apply [F2] to ϕ on [0,t∗] to get ξ∈(0,t∗) with ϕ′(ξ)=(ϕ(t∗)−ϕ(0))/t∗=c1ϕ′(0). Hence ∣ϕ′(ξ)∣=c1∣ϕ′(0)∣<c2∣ϕ′(0)∣, so the strong curvature inequality holds strictly at ξ.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1F1∎

The strict Armijo inequality holds at every point of (0,t∗), including ξ, and both ϕ and ϕ′ are continuous there. Therefore both strict inequalities persist on some open interval about ξ contained in (0,t∗). Every point of that interval is a strong Wolfe step, proving the asserted nonemptiness.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources