Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Shape-regular affine P1 interpolation estimates for C2 functions

Statement

Use the fixed dimension d≥2 and the finite shape-regular affine simplicial mesh family from Stationary multidimensional convection–diffusion–reaction P1 model and Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity. Let u∈C2(Ω‾), and on each simplex K let IKu=∑i=0du(ai)λi be its nodal affine interpolant, where ai are the vertices and λi the barycentric coordinates. Set Ihu∣K=IKu and M2:=∣Ω∣1/2∥D2u∥L∞(Ω), using the Euclidean matrix norm for D2u. There is a constant CI depending only on d and the shape-regularity bound such that ∥u−Ihu∥L2(Ω)≤CIh2M2,∥∇(u−Ihu)∥L2(Ω)≤CIhM2. If u=0 on ∂Ω, then Ihu=0 on every boundary facet.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite matching affine simplicial mesh family, its shape-regularity bound σ, and u∈C2(Ω‾).

[F1]

Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity: each cell is a nondegenerate affine simplex, its barycentric coordinates are affine, and its inradius ρK satisfies hK/ρK≤σ.

[F2]

Stationary multidimensional convection–diffusion–reaction P1 model: h=max⁡KhK, the mesh is finite, and ∑K∣K∣=∣Ω∣.

Proof

1.1F1givenconstruct

Fix a cell K and a vertex a0. Taylor's formula along the segment from a0 to x∈K gives u(x)=pK(x)+rK(x) with pK(x)=u(a0)+∇u(a0)⋅(x−a0), ∣rK(x)∣≤12hK2∥D2u∥L∞(K), and ∣∇rK(x)∣≤hK∥D2u∥L∞(K).

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

The nodal interpolant reproduces pK, so u−IKu=rK−∑irK(ai)λi. On K, 0≤λi≤1 and ∑iλi=1. The altitude from any vertex to its opposite facet is at least ρK, hence ∣∇λi∣≤ρK−1≤σhK−1 by [F1]. Substitution of the bounds in step 1.1 gives ∣u−IKu∣≤C(d)hK2∥D2u∥L∞(K) and ∣∇(u−IKu)∣≤C(d,σ)hK∥D2u∥L∞(K).

3.1F2step 2.1algebra

Squaring the two pointwise bounds, integrating on each cell, summing over the finite mesh, using hK≤h and ∑K∣K∣=∣Ω∣, and taking square roots proves both global estimates with M2=∣Ω∣1/2∥D2u∥∞.

4.1F1givenstep 2.1∎

On a shared interior facet, the affine traces from its two incident cells agree at all facet vertices, so they agree everywhere on that facet; thus the cell interpolants assemble to a continuous Ihu. If u vanishes on a boundary facet, all its vertices there have zero nodal values, so the affine trace also vanishes there. This proves both global conformity and the boundary claim.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · one level

2 results within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources