How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Shape-regular affine P1 interpolation estimates for C2 functions
Statement
Use the fixed dimension and the finite shape-regular affine simplicial mesh family from Stationary multidimensional convection–diffusion–reaction P1 model and Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity. Let , and on each simplex let be its nodal affine interpolant, where are the vertices and the barycentric coordinates. Set and , using the Euclidean matrix norm for . There is a constant depending only on and the shape-regularity bound such that If on , then on every boundary facet.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite matching affine simplicial mesh family, its shape-regularity bound , and .
Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity: each cell is a nondegenerate affine simplex, its barycentric coordinates are affine, and its inradius satisfies .
Stationary multidimensional convection–diffusion–reaction P1 model: , the mesh is finite, and .
Proof
Fix a cell and a vertex . Taylor's formula along the segment from to gives with , , and .
The nodal interpolant reproduces , so . On , and . The altitude from any vertex to its opposite facet is at least , hence by [F1]. Substitution of the bounds in step 1.1 gives and .
Squaring the two pointwise bounds, integrating on each cell, summing over the finite mesh, using and , and taking square roots proves both global estimates with .
On a shared interior facet, the affine traces from its two incident cells agree at all facet vertices, so they agree everywhere on that facet; thus the cell interpolants assemble to a continuous . If vanishes on a boundary facet, all its vertices there have zero nodal values, so the affine trace also vanishes there. This proves both global conformity and the boundary claim.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · one level
2 results within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Volker John, Numerical Methods for Convection-Dominated Problems, lecture notes, Chapter 5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jean-Luc Guermond, MATH 661 Fall 2025, Chapter 11, Local interpolation on affine meshes (standard reference, not scraped)