How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The support of a cyclic quotient is its vanishing set
Statement
For an ideal of a commutative ring ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring and an ideal .
A prime ideal lies in exactly when (Support of a module).
Localisation commutes with quotients: (Localisation commutes with quotient rings: ).
The local ring has maximal ideal , and the units are exactly the fractions with numerator outside ( is local with unique maximal ideal ).
Proof
Fix a prime ideal . By [L2], exactly when .
If , then every generator of lies in the maximal ideal from [L3], so is proper and the quotient is nonzero.
If , choose . Then is a unit in by [L3], and it lies in , so and the quotient is zero.
By steps 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3, lies in exactly when .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., (13.27) (standard reference, not scraped)