Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Surface geometric regularity field test and generic spread

Statement

Assume AC. For a Noetherian k-algebra T, call T geometrically regular if T⊗kE is regular for every finitely generated field extension E/k. It suffices to test finite purely inseparable E/k. Geometric regularity is stable under finitely generated field extension. If K/k is finitely generated, finite purely inseparable enlargements K′/K and k′/k make K′/k′ separably generated. A separably generated generic fraction-field extension of finite-type domains spreads to a nonempty standard smooth open after localizing the base and source.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Noetherian k-algebra T (the ring to be tested) and a finitely generated field extension K/k of finite-type domains used in the spread.

[F1]

def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set F all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function g with domain F satisfying g(S)∈S for all S∈F. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F3]

lem-ag-standard-smooth-flatness. Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let R be a commutative ring and let S be a standard smooth R-algebra (def-ag-standard-smooth-algebra), so that S≅(R[x1,…,xn]/(f1,…,fc))g for some n≥c≥0, some f1,…,fc,g∈R[x1,…,xn], and with the leading c×c Jacobian minor (Standard smooth algebras are finitely presented and flat)

[F4]

lem-ag-standard-smooth-regular-geometric-fibres. Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let R be a commutative ring and let S be a standard smooth R-algebra (def-ag-standard-smooth-algebra), presented as S≅(R[x1,…,xn]/(f1,…,fc))g with leading c×c Jacobian minor h mapping to a unit of S. (Fibres of standard smooth algebras are regular of relative dimension)

[F5]

lem-flat-local-ascent-of-regularity. Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a flat local map (R,m)→(S,n) of nonzero Noetherian local rings: if R and S/mS are regular, then S is regular. Conversely, regularity of S implies regularity of R. (flat local ascent of regularity)

[F6]

thm-localisation-and-polynomial-extension-of-regular-rings. Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Localizations and finite polynomial extensions of a commutative regular Noetherian ring are regular. Regularity can equivalently be tested at maximal ideals. For every nonzero such ring, gldim⁡R=dim⁡R, allowing infinity. (localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings)

[F7]

thm-primitive-element-theorem-for-finite-separable-extensions. Let E=F(α1,…,αr) be a finite extension. If all but possibly one of the generators are separable over F, then E/F is simple. In particular, every finite separable extension is simple. (A finite extension generated by elements all but possibly one of which are separable is simple)

Proof

1.1F1F7givenalgebra

In characteristic p>0, choose a transcendence basis y for K/k and let M be the maximal separable subextension of the finite extension K/k(y). If K≠M, choose β∈K∖M with α=βp∈M. Adjoin to k the pth roots of the finitely many coefficients occurring in the numerator and denominator polynomials of the coefficients of the separable minimal polynomial of α over k(y), and adjoin y1/p to the upper field. This gives finite purely inseparable enlargements. In the separable compositum, that polynomial has pth-power coefficients; taking their roots gives a separable polynomial for a root whose pth power is α. Uniqueness of a pth root in a field puts β in the enlarged separable subfield. Thus the remaining inseparable degree strictly decreases. Induction makes the upper extension separably generated; characteristic zero needs no enlargement.

1.2F3F4F7construct

A separably generated field extension E/k is finite separable over k(y) for a separating transcendence basis y. By the primitive-element theorem write E=k(y)(θ). Clear the coefficients of its monic minimal polynomial by localizing k[y], and invert its nonzero derivative at θ; this gives a standard smooth domain with fraction field E. For a finite-type domain map R→C whose fraction-field extension is separably generated, the same construction is over R after inverting finitely many nonzero base elements. The resulting smooth algebra and C have the same fraction field and agree after further localization: express each finite generating family rationally in the other and invert all the denominators. This supplies a nonempty standard smooth source open over a localized base.

2.1F3F4F5F6step 1.1step 1.2

Suppose T⊗kk′ is regular for every finite purely inseparable k′/k. Given a finitely generated E/k, step 1.1 gives finite purely inseparable k′/k and E′/E with E′/k′ separably generated. Choose the standard smooth model of E′/k′ from step 1.2. Its base change to the regular ring T⊗kk′ is flat with regular geometric fibres by [F3] and [F4]; [F5] makes it regular locally. Localizing to its fraction field gives regularity of T⊗kE′.

3.1F5step 2.1

The map T⊗kE→T⊗kE′ is faithfully flat. At every prime of the source choose a prime above it; [F5] descends regularity of the corresponding target local ring, so T⊗kE is regular. This proves sufficiency of the purely inseparable test; necessity follows because such extensions are finitely generated.

4.1givenstep 1.2step 3.1

If T is geometrically regular and E/k is finitely generated, then every finitely generated extension F/E is finitely generated over k. Hence (T⊗kE)⊗EF=T⊗kF is regular, proving stability under the stated field extensions. The generic-spread assertion is step 1.2.

5.1F1step 4.1∎

AC is inherited from the cited regularity and basis suppliers; the finite inseparable induction and the denominator choices introduce no additional choice hypothesis.

Remarks

  • The two halves of the item are the field-theoretic preparation (finite purely inseparable enlargement making the extension separably generated) and the algebraic spreading of a separably generated generic extension to a standard smooth open.
  • Only finitely many coefficients and denominators are adjusted in step 1.1, which is why the enlargement can be taken finite.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

72 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources