Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Tangent spaces of products over a field

Statement

Let k be a field, let X,Y be k-schemes, and let x∈X, y∈Y be k-rational points. Write pX:X×kY→X and pY:X×kY→Y for the projections. The canonical map T(x,y)(X×kY)⟶TxX⊕TyY that sends a tangent vector, represented by a based map γ:Spec⁡(k[ϵ]/(ϵ2))→X×kY, to (pX∘γ,pY∘γ) is a k-linear isomorphism. No finite-type, reducedness, or smoothness hypothesis is needed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, k-schemes X,Y, and points x,y whose residue fields are identified with k by their structure maps.

[F1]

Schemes: each point of a scheme has an open neighbourhood that is an affine scheme with the restricted structure sheaf.

[F2]

Schemes and morphisms over a base: a k-scheme and its morphisms to other k-schemes have structure maps to Spec⁡k and commute with those maps.

[F3]

The affine scheme of dual numbers: the dual-numbers scheme is Spec⁡(k[ϵ]/(ϵ2)).

[F4]

Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings: a map between affine schemes corresponds contravariantly to a ring map; in particular, based maps from the dual-numbers scheme into an affine chart correspond to k-algebra maps from its coordinate ring to k[ϵ]/(ϵ2).

[F5]

Existence of all scheme fibre products: for affine covers of k-schemes X,Y, the product X×kY has an open affine cover with charts Spec⁡(A⊗kB) for charts Spec⁡A⊆X and Spec⁡B⊆Y.

[F6]

Universal mapping property of the tensor product of commutative algebras: given k-algebra maps A→C and B→C, there is a unique k-algebra map A⊗kB→C whose restrictions to A and B are the given maps; it sends a⊗b to the product of their images.

[F7]

Tangent vectors at rational points are dual-number points: for any k-scheme at a k-rational point, its tangent vectors are naturally the based dual-number maps, as a k-vector space.

[F8]

Tangent vectors at rational points are dual-number points: under the same identification, a based local map a↦a(x)+ϵD(a) is the k-derivation D representing the tangent vector.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F5givenalgebra

By [F1], choose affine open neighbourhoods U=Spec⁡A of x and V=Spec⁡B of y. Their structure maps make A and B k-algebras by [F2]. The fibre-product theorem [F5] gives an open affine neighbourhood of (x,y) in X×kY with coordinate ring R=A⊗kB; the two projections correspond to its canonical k-algebra maps from A and B.

2.1F3F4F5F6F7step 1.1givenalgebra

Let ex:A→k and ey:B→k be the maps of the rational points, and put D=k[ϵ]/(ϵ2). By [F7] and [F4], a tangent vector at x or y is represented in these charts by a k-algebra map α:A→D or β:B→D, with reductions ex and ey. Conversely, any such pair determines by [F6] a unique k-algebra map φ:R→D satisfying φ(a⊗b)=α(a)β(b). Its reduction is a⊗b↦ex(a)ey(b), so it is based at (x,y). Restriction along the two projection maps recovers α and β; therefore post-composition by the projections gives a bijection between the based dual-number maps of the product and pairs of based dual-number maps of the factors.

3.1F6F7F8step 1.1step 2.1givenalgebra

Write α(a)=ex(a)+ϵDx(a) and β(b)=ey(b)+ϵDy(b); [F8] says Dx,Dy are the derivations representing the two tangent vectors. Since ϵ2=0, the map of step 2.1 satisfies φ(a⊗b)=ex(a)ey(b)+ϵ(ey(b)Dx(a)+ex(a)Dy(b)). Thus its coefficient derivation is linear in (Dx,Dy). Conversely, restriction of the coefficient derivation of φ along the two projection maps returns Dx,Dy. The bijection in step 2.1 and its inverse are therefore k-linear, proving the asserted natural vector-space isomorphism. Its construction uses only the projections, so it is independent of the chosen affine neighbourhoods.

4.1F1F3F7F8step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1givenalgebra∎

If either factor has zero tangent space, its based maps consist only of the constant map at that point, and step 2.1 pairs it with the based maps of the other factor; if both tangent spaces are zero, the product tangent space is zero as well. For a one-dimensional tangent factor with generator derivation Dx, step 3.1 sends (Dx,0) to the coefficient derivation a⊗b↦ey(b)Dx(a); a generator Dy in the other factor is sent to a⊗b↦ex(a)Dy(b). Each scalar multiple is sent to the same scalar multiple; no one-dimensional exception occurs. The formula also covers nonsmooth and nonreduced schemes because it uses only their based dual-number maps. The zero vector is the constant based map, and the zero pair corresponds to the constant map at (x,y). If either scheme is empty, there is no point pair and the assertion has no instance. Only one affine neighbourhood for each of the two fixed points is used, no bases are chosen, and no Axiom of Choice is needed. The statement contains no iff claim.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources