Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Jones–Wenzl recursion gives annihilating idempotents and their trace

Statement

Let δ∈C× and suppose [2]δ,…,[n]δ are nonzero. The recursively defined pn of Jones–Wenzl recursion in the nonvanishing-denominator range is nonzero, satisfies pn2=pn, and obeys dipn=pndi=0 for 1≤i<n. Its corner is one-dimensional, pnTLnpn=Cpn, and its normalized closure trace is

τn(pn)=[n+1]δδn.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The loop convention, the local generator relations, quantum integer recurrence, and normalized closure trace.

[F1]

The generators satisfy di2=δdi, didi±1di=di, and distant commutation (The elementary diagram generators satisfy the local Temperley–Lieb relations).

[F2]

The recursion is pr+1=Pr−[r][r+1]PrdrPr, with Pr=pr⊗1 (Jones–Wenzl recursion in the nonvanishing-denominator range).

[F3]

The quantum integers satisfy [r+1]=δ[r]−[r−1] (Temperley–Lieb quantum integers and quantum characteristic).

[F4]

The closure trace is cyclic and has τr+1(x⊗1)=τr(x) and τr+1((x⊗1)dr)=δ−1τr(x) (The normalized closure trace is cyclic and satisfies the Markov rules).

[F5]

Finite words in the elementary diagram generators, including the empty word for the unit, span the diagram algebra (Elementary cup-cap diagrams generate every finite planar pairing endomorphism diagram).

[F6]

A through strand is a path joining a top point to a bottom point. Each diagram is a matching of boundary points; an elementary di in TLn has fewer than n through strands, and every through strand of a composite must pass through a distinct through strand at the intermediate boundary (Temperley–Lieb planar diagram data and endomorphism modules).

[F7]

Write εs(x) for the coefficient of the identity diagram in the diagram basis of TLs; in particular, a linear combination of diagrams with fewer than s through strands has εs=0.

Proof

technique · Induct on the strand number, proving the recursion identities and normalized trace together
1.1F1F3F4F5F6F7givenbasealgebra

For ranks zero and one, p0=p1=1 has all asserted properties, εs(ps)=1, and trace 1=[1]/δ0=[2]/δ where applicable. At rank two, p2=1−δ−1d1; d12=δd1 gives p22=p2 and d1p2=p2d1=0, ε2(p2)=1, its corner is Cp2 since 1,d1 span TL2, and τ2(p2)=1−δ−2=[3]/δ2.

2.1step 1.1ih

Fix r≥2 and assume inductively that through rank r the recursively defined elements are nonzero idempotents, satisfy εs(ps)=1, are annihilated on both sides by every generator, have corner Cps, and satisfy τs(ps)=[s+1]/δs.

3.1F1F2F3step 2.1algebra

Put P=pr⊗1, Q=pr−1⊗1⊗1, a=dr−1, b=dr, and μ=[r−1]/[r]. The recursion at rank r gives P=Q−μQaQ; Q is idempotent, commutes with b, and bab=b by [F1]. Therefore bPb=δQb−μQbabQ=(δ−μ)Qb=([r+1]/[r])Qb by [F3].

4.1F1F2F6F7step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Set X=PbP and c=[r]/[r+1]. Since PQ=QP=P, step 3.1 gives X2=P(bPb)P=([r+1]/[r])X, so (P−cX)2=P−cX=pr+1. Also bpr+1=bP−cbPbP=0 by step 3.1 and QbP=bP; and pr+1b=Pb−cPbPb=0 because PbPb=P(bPb)=([r+1]/[r])PQb=([r+1]/[r])Pb. For i<r, both annihilation identities follow from the induction hypothesis. Juxtaposing a vertical strand preserves the identity coefficient, so εr+1(P)=εr(pr)=1. The correction term PbP has fewer than r+1 through strands, since every diagram term passes through b=dr, which itself has fewer than r+1, and stacking cannot increase that count by [F6]. Hence εr+1(PbP)=0, so εr+1(pr+1)=1 and pr+1≠0.

5.1F5step 4.1algebra

Every nonempty generator word has a rightmost letter which kills pr+1 by step 4.1. Since generator words span TLr+1 by [F5], pr+1TLr+1pr+1=Cpr+1.

6.1F3F4step 2.1step 4.1inductiondischarge-induction∎

By [F4], τr+1(P)=τr(pr) and, using cyclicity, τr+1(X)=τr+1(PbP)=τr+1(bP2)=τr+1(Pb)=δ−1τr(pr). Hence τr+1(pr+1)=τr(pr)(1−[r]/(δ[r+1]))=[r+2]/δr+1 by [F3] and the induction hypothesis. This proves the trace recurrence and closes the induction.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources