How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Jones–Wenzl recursion gives annihilating idempotents and their trace
Statement
Let and suppose are nonzero. The recursively defined of Jones–Wenzl recursion in the nonvanishing-denominator range is nonzero, satisfies , and obeys for . Its corner is one-dimensional, , and its normalized closure trace is
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The loop convention, the local generator relations, quantum integer recurrence, and normalized closure trace.
The generators satisfy , , and distant commutation (The elementary diagram generators satisfy the local Temperley–Lieb relations).
The recursion is , with (Jones–Wenzl recursion in the nonvanishing-denominator range).
The quantum integers satisfy (Temperley–Lieb quantum integers and quantum characteristic).
The closure trace is cyclic and has and (The normalized closure trace is cyclic and satisfies the Markov rules).
Finite words in the elementary diagram generators, including the empty word for the unit, span the diagram algebra (Elementary cup-cap diagrams generate every finite planar pairing endomorphism diagram).
A through strand is a path joining a top point to a bottom point. Each diagram is a matching of boundary points; an elementary in has fewer than through strands, and every through strand of a composite must pass through a distinct through strand at the intermediate boundary (Temperley–Lieb planar diagram data and endomorphism modules).
Write for the coefficient of the identity diagram in the diagram basis of ; in particular, a linear combination of diagrams with fewer than through strands has .
Proof
For ranks zero and one, has all asserted properties, , and trace where applicable. At rank two, ; gives and , , its corner is since span , and .
Fix and assume inductively that through rank the recursively defined elements are nonzero idempotents, satisfy , are annihilated on both sides by every generator, have corner , and satisfy .
Put , , , , and . The recursion at rank gives ; is idempotent, commutes with , and by [F1]. Therefore by [F3].
Set and . Since , step 3.1 gives , so . Also by step 3.1 and ; and because . For , both annihilation identities follow from the induction hypothesis. Juxtaposing a vertical strand preserves the identity coefficient, so . The correction term has fewer than through strands, since every diagram term passes through , which itself has fewer than , and stacking cannot increase that count by [F6]. Hence , so and .
Every nonempty generator word has a rightmost letter which kills by step 4.1. Since generator words span by [F5], .
By [F4], and, using cyclicity, . Hence by [F3] and the induction hypothesis. This proves the trace recurrence and closes the induction.
Depends on
- Temperley–Lieb planar diagram data and endomorphism modules
- Jones–Wenzl recursion in the nonvanishing-denominator range
- The elementary diagram generators satisfy the local Temperley–Lieb relations
- Elementary cup-cap diagrams generate every finite planar pairing endomorphism diagram
- The normalized closure trace is cyclic and satisfies the Markov rules
- Temperley–Lieb quantum integers and quantum characteristic
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Joshua Chen, The Temperley-Lieb Categories and Skein Modules (standard reference, not scraped)
- David Ridout and Yvan Saint-Aubin, Standard Modules, Induction and the Structure of the Temperley-Lieb Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)